"There is no reason why marriage should necessarily compel an actress to forego her career"
About this Quote
The subtext is about respectability as a trapdoor. Early 20th-century stardom gave women visibility and income, but also made them targets for moral policing. Marriage was marketed as the respectable endpoint, a way to sanitize a public woman by returning her to private life. Burke, a working actress in an era when female ambition could be read as promiscuity or vanity, reframes the debate as simple practicality: why should a legal status cancel competence?
It also lands as a strategic defense of acting itself. By treating an actress's work as a "career" - not a phase, not a hobby until a man arrives - she demands professional parity with male artists who were rarely asked to choose between love and labor. The line is restrained because restraint was a survival skill; an actress had to sound reasonable to be heard at all. That is the cultural power here: feminism smuggled through common sense, a challenge to the domestic script delivered in the calm tone of someone refusing to beg for permission.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work-Life Balance |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Burke, Billie. (2026, January 16). There is no reason why marriage should necessarily compel an actress to forego her career. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-reason-why-marriage-should-139320/
Chicago Style
Burke, Billie. "There is no reason why marriage should necessarily compel an actress to forego her career." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-reason-why-marriage-should-139320/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"There is no reason why marriage should necessarily compel an actress to forego her career." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/there-is-no-reason-why-marriage-should-139320/. Accessed 21 Feb. 2026.



