"There is no shorter path for joining a neutral existential anthropology, according to philosophy, with the existential decision before God, according to the Bible"
About this Quote
Ricoeur is trying to weld together two worlds that usually eye each other with suspicion: the cool, “neutral” study of what it means to be human and the heated, non-neutral demand of faith. The line works because it refuses the fantasy of an easy bridge. “No shorter path” is a warning shot at both camps: philosophers who want religious meaning to drop out of anthropology like a neat conclusion, and believers who want existential analysis to serve as a preface to conversion.
The phrase “neutral existential anthropology” is deliberately taut. Existential thought, after all, is rarely neutral; it deals in anxiety, finitude, guilt, freedom. Ricoeur’s point is that philosophy can map the human condition without pronouncing on God, but that map never becomes the biblical “decision before God” by simple continuity. Something has to happen that is not just descriptive but normative, not just interpretation but commitment.
Subtext: hermeneutics as discipline and as humility. Ricoeur, shaped by postwar European thought (Heidegger in the background, Bultmann and biblical interpretation in the wings), is defending a mediated faith: belief that passes through critique, language, and interpretation rather than bypassing them with certainty. He’s also resisting reductionism. The Bible is not merely a document of human self-understanding; it addresses the reader, demands response, and re-narrates the self under a different authority.
The intent is both methodological and ethical: keep philosophy honest about its limits, keep theology honest about its leap. The “path” isn’t a shortcut because it’s not a technique; it’s a transformation of stance.
The phrase “neutral existential anthropology” is deliberately taut. Existential thought, after all, is rarely neutral; it deals in anxiety, finitude, guilt, freedom. Ricoeur’s point is that philosophy can map the human condition without pronouncing on God, but that map never becomes the biblical “decision before God” by simple continuity. Something has to happen that is not just descriptive but normative, not just interpretation but commitment.
Subtext: hermeneutics as discipline and as humility. Ricoeur, shaped by postwar European thought (Heidegger in the background, Bultmann and biblical interpretation in the wings), is defending a mediated faith: belief that passes through critique, language, and interpretation rather than bypassing them with certainty. He’s also resisting reductionism. The Bible is not merely a document of human self-understanding; it addresses the reader, demands response, and re-narrates the self under a different authority.
The intent is both methodological and ethical: keep philosophy honest about its limits, keep theology honest about its leap. The “path” isn’t a shortcut because it’s not a technique; it’s a transformation of stance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Bible |
|---|
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List







