"There is no such thing as immaterial matter. All spirit is matter, but is more fine or pure, and can only be discerned by purer eyes. We cannot see it, but when our bodies are purified, we shall see that it is all matter"
About this Quote
Joseph Smith yanks the supernatural out of the clouds and drops it onto the workbench. In three brisk moves, he collapses the tidy Enlightenment split between “real” matter and “mere” spirit, recasts the afterlife as a material continuum, and makes spiritual authority feel oddly empirical. The line isn’t mystical vapor; it’s a claim about the universe’s operating system: everything is substance, just at different grades of refinement.
The intent is pastoral and polemical at once. Pastoral, because it reassures believers that salvation isn’t an abstract moral scorecard but a future of tangible embodiment and perceivable reality. Polemical, because it positions Smith against mainstream Protestant immaterialism (and against any philosophy that treats spirit as metaphor). By insisting that spirit is “more fine or pure,” he borrows the prestige of science’s language of particles and purity without conceding science’s gatekeeping. It’s a metaphysics that sounds testable while remaining safely deferred: you can’t see it now, but you will when you’re “purified.”
That last conditional is the subtextual power play. “Purer eyes” does double duty: it flatters the faithful with a coming upgrade in perception, and it quietly disqualifies skeptics as spiritually unfit observers. If you can’t verify the claim, the problem isn’t the claim; it’s you.
Context matters: early 19th-century America was buzzing with revivalism, folk cosmologies, and a hunger for systems that felt both concrete and cosmic. Smith’s materialized spirit answers that appetite, turning theology into a kind of frontier physics where the invisible isn’t unreal - just not yet within range.
The intent is pastoral and polemical at once. Pastoral, because it reassures believers that salvation isn’t an abstract moral scorecard but a future of tangible embodiment and perceivable reality. Polemical, because it positions Smith against mainstream Protestant immaterialism (and against any philosophy that treats spirit as metaphor). By insisting that spirit is “more fine or pure,” he borrows the prestige of science’s language of particles and purity without conceding science’s gatekeeping. It’s a metaphysics that sounds testable while remaining safely deferred: you can’t see it now, but you will when you’re “purified.”
That last conditional is the subtextual power play. “Purer eyes” does double duty: it flatters the faithful with a coming upgrade in perception, and it quietly disqualifies skeptics as spiritually unfit observers. If you can’t verify the claim, the problem isn’t the claim; it’s you.
Context matters: early 19th-century America was buzzing with revivalism, folk cosmologies, and a hunger for systems that felt both concrete and cosmic. Smith’s materialized spirit answers that appetite, turning theology into a kind of frontier physics where the invisible isn’t unreal - just not yet within range.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|---|
| Source | Doctrine and Covenants, Section 131, verse 7 (Joseph Smith). |
More Quotes by Joseph
Add to List






