"There is none to tell the rich to go on striving, for a rich man makes the law that hallows and hollows his own life"

Sean O'Casey's quote, "There is none to inform the rich to go on striving, for a rich male makes the law that hallows and hollows his own life", provides an engaging commentary on wealth, power, and self-determination. The quote reviews the ramifications of wealth for personal ambition and ethical stability. Let's break it down in sections for a much deeper interpretation:

The initial part, "There is none to inform the abundant to go on aiming", suggests a sense of complacency or lack of external inspiration for those who are already wealthy. Normally, social expectations or financial requirement drive the majority of people to strive for greater success. Nevertheless, for the abundant, this external push may be missing since they have currently accomplished considerable product success. This suggests that wealth can possibly cause stagnation if not countered by an internal drive.

The phrase "for a rich man makes the law" highlights the concept that wealth typically grants power-- specifically, the power to determine or affect guidelines and standards, be it in a literal legislative sense or in a metaphorical sense of setting the norms for one's own life. This component of control allows the wealthy to operate within a self-defined structure, possibly leading to an absence of challenge or growth if not assisted by self-reflection and integrity.

Lastly, "that hallows and hollows his own life" provides a dichotomy. To "hallow" is to honor as holy or sacred, suggesting that wealth can be seen as a true blessing that provides opportunities and opportunities. Conversely, to "hollow" is to clear out, showing that without function or an assisting concept beyond self-interest, wealth can cause an empty or unfulfilling life. This duality points to the possible spiritual or existential void that can accompany material abundance when not coupled with meaningful pursuits or worths.

In essence, O'Casey is exploring the internal dynamics of wealth, indicating that while riches can consecrate life with convenience and power, they can concurrently remove it of much deeper meaning without the consistent pursuit of something higher than simple build-up. Wealth, then, becomes a tool that can define a life in both uplifted and vacuous terms, based on the choices and inner inspirations of the individual.