"There was a president imposed by Syria. Our battle... is to have a Lebanese president that we elect"
About this Quote
A line like this is less a lament than a political pressure tactic, calibrated to sound like democratic principle while naming a culprit everyone in Lebanon already recognizes. Walid Jumblatt’s “president imposed by Syria” compresses years of tutelage into a single verb: imposed. It frames the presidency not as a constitutional office but as occupied territory, a symbol of sovereignty hijacked by a neighboring power and by local brokers willing to cash that influence in.
The intent is twofold. First, it delegitimizes the sitting or recent presidency without getting stuck in procedural details. Second, it rallies a coalition around a deceptively simple demand: “a Lebanese president that we elect.” The subtext is that elections exist, but choice doesn’t. Jumblatt is pointing at the gap between formal institutions and the reality of power, where external patrons and internal militias, parties, and patronage networks preselect outcomes long before ballots are cast.
Context matters: Jumblatt is a veteran of Lebanon’s sectarian chessboard, fluent in the language of sovereignty when it mobilizes street anger and parliamentary arithmetic. By invoking Syria explicitly, he taps a post-civil war grievance and a widening regional story about proxy influence. “Our battle” is doing extra work here, transforming a constitutional question into a national struggle, one that invites moral clarity in a system engineered to blur responsibility.
It works because it offers a clean villain and a clean remedy in a country where nothing is clean: restore agency, name the coercion, and make the presidency the litmus test for whether Lebanon is governing itself or being managed.
The intent is twofold. First, it delegitimizes the sitting or recent presidency without getting stuck in procedural details. Second, it rallies a coalition around a deceptively simple demand: “a Lebanese president that we elect.” The subtext is that elections exist, but choice doesn’t. Jumblatt is pointing at the gap between formal institutions and the reality of power, where external patrons and internal militias, parties, and patronage networks preselect outcomes long before ballots are cast.
Context matters: Jumblatt is a veteran of Lebanon’s sectarian chessboard, fluent in the language of sovereignty when it mobilizes street anger and parliamentary arithmetic. By invoking Syria explicitly, he taps a post-civil war grievance and a widening regional story about proxy influence. “Our battle” is doing extra work here, transforming a constitutional question into a national struggle, one that invites moral clarity in a system engineered to blur responsibility.
It works because it offers a clean villain and a clean remedy in a country where nothing is clean: restore agency, name the coercion, and make the presidency the litmus test for whether Lebanon is governing itself or being managed.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Walid
Add to List

