"There's a difference... between the kind of woman you would bang and the kind of woman you would marry"
About this Quote
Leykis is doing what shock-jock radio has always done: turning a private, ugly social sorting mechanism into a punchline you can repeat at work. The line hinges on a crass binary - "bang" versus "marry" - that pretends to be plainspoken honesty, when its real function is permission. It gives listeners a script that frames their own contradictions as common sense: desire can be selfish and disposable; commitment must be disciplined and strategic.
The intent is less advice than calibration. By naming two categories of women, Leykis invites men to narrate their dating lives like a risk-management problem: sex is consumption, marriage is investment. That framing smuggles in a moral hierarchy while dodging accountability for it. "Bang" women are eroticized and disrespected; "marry" women are respected, but in a way that can read as surveillance - valued for stability, purity, or status rather than personhood. The subtext is fear: fear of being "trapped", fear of choosing wrong, fear that intimacy equals losing leverage.
Context matters because Leykis rose in an era when talk radio monetized grievance and performance masculinity. The quote flatters the audience as savvy realists who see through romance, even as it reinforces a Madonna/whore split that modern dating culture keeps trying (and failing) to outgrow. Its effectiveness comes from its brutality: it’s short, quotable, and daring enough to feel transgressive, which is exactly why it travels. It doesn’t just describe sexism; it sells it as hard-earned wisdom.
The intent is less advice than calibration. By naming two categories of women, Leykis invites men to narrate their dating lives like a risk-management problem: sex is consumption, marriage is investment. That framing smuggles in a moral hierarchy while dodging accountability for it. "Bang" women are eroticized and disrespected; "marry" women are respected, but in a way that can read as surveillance - valued for stability, purity, or status rather than personhood. The subtext is fear: fear of being "trapped", fear of choosing wrong, fear that intimacy equals losing leverage.
Context matters because Leykis rose in an era when talk radio monetized grievance and performance masculinity. The quote flatters the audience as savvy realists who see through romance, even as it reinforces a Madonna/whore split that modern dating culture keeps trying (and failing) to outgrow. Its effectiveness comes from its brutality: it’s short, quotable, and daring enough to feel transgressive, which is exactly why it travels. It doesn’t just describe sexism; it sells it as hard-earned wisdom.
Quote Details
| Topic | Relationship |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List
