"There's no conflict between the social-welfare state and open markets"
About this Quote
The intent is pragmatic and disciplinary: accept markets as the engine, keep the welfare state as the suspension system, and stop pretending one cancels the other. In the early 2000s, Germany was stuck with high unemployment, sluggish growth, and the pressures of EU integration and globalization. Schroder’s Agenda 2010 and Hartz labor reforms were sold as modernization, but they were also a wager that social democracy could survive only by embracing flexibility, exports, and fiscal credibility. This quote is the bumper-sticker version of that wager.
The subtext cuts two ways. To conservatives, it signals: you can have open markets without smashing solidarity; the state can be an enabler, not a drag. To his own base, it warns: protecting people cannot mean protecting every job arrangement; welfare has to be compatible with churn. The rhetorical power comes from its calm certainty. “No conflict” is an audacious claim in a country where “social market economy” is almost civic religion, and where every reform feels like a referendum on identity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Schroder, Gerhard. (2026, January 18). There's no conflict between the social-welfare state and open markets. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/theres-no-conflict-between-the-social-welfare-19898/
Chicago Style
Schroder, Gerhard. "There's no conflict between the social-welfare state and open markets." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/theres-no-conflict-between-the-social-welfare-19898/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"There's no conflict between the social-welfare state and open markets." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/theres-no-conflict-between-the-social-welfare-19898/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.







