"There's no difference between one's killing and making decisions that will send others to kill. It's exactly the same thing, or even worse"
About this Quote
Moral distance is the most convenient weapon in a leader's arsenal, and Golda Meir takes a hammer to it. The line refuses the comforting fiction that political authority is somehow cleaner than physical violence. If you authorize force, you are not an abstract manager of outcomes; you are implicated in the blood calculus. The provocation sits in the escalation: “or even worse.” Meir isn’t just flattening the difference between pulling a trigger and signing an order; she’s suggesting that delegation can deepen culpability. Killing up close carries immediacy, even risk. Sending others to kill lets you keep your hands steady, your schedule intact, your conscience padded by procedure.
The intent is bracingly unsentimental: to strip away the bureaucratic alibi of “necessity,” “security,” or “national interest” and expose the decision as a personal moral act. It’s a warning to the public, too. Citizens often treat war as an appliance: turn it on, hope it works, complain about the noise. Meir implies the electorate shares in the fantasy that violence can be outsourced without ethical residue.
Context matters. Meir governed Israel during an era when war was not hypothetical and decisions were measured in lives, legitimacy, and survival, especially around the 1973 Yom Kippur War and the long shadow of the Holocaust. Her bluntness reads less like theory than like a leader forcing herself to look directly at what state power does. The line works because it denies everyone, especially the decision-maker, the luxury of innocence.
The intent is bracingly unsentimental: to strip away the bureaucratic alibi of “necessity,” “security,” or “national interest” and expose the decision as a personal moral act. It’s a warning to the public, too. Citizens often treat war as an appliance: turn it on, hope it works, complain about the noise. Meir implies the electorate shares in the fantasy that violence can be outsourced without ethical residue.
Context matters. Meir governed Israel during an era when war was not hypothetical and decisions were measured in lives, legitimacy, and survival, especially around the 1973 Yom Kippur War and the long shadow of the Holocaust. Her bluntness reads less like theory than like a leader forcing herself to look directly at what state power does. The line works because it denies everyone, especially the decision-maker, the luxury of innocence.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Golda
Add to List





