"These are the multinationals, like General Motors and Nestle; these are the big industrial groups that weigh, on the monetary scale, much more than big countries like Egypt"
About this Quote
Power, Ben Bella suggests, has quietly changed passports. In naming General Motors and Nestle alongside Egypt, he isn’t just doing a dramatic size comparison; he’s reframing sovereignty as an accounting problem. The line works because it treats “countries” and “companies” as commensurable units on a single “monetary scale,” then lets the moral dissonance hang in the air: if wealth is the yardstick, political independence starts to look like a ceremonial flag.
Ben Bella’s intent is bluntly political. As a leader shaped by anti-colonial struggle and the post-independence scramble to build a viable Algerian state, he is warning that liberation can be undone without a single soldier crossing a border. Multinationals can extract value, dictate terms, and reshape domestic priorities through investment, debt, supply chains, and access to technology. The subtext is that formal decolonization can be followed by economic captivity, where boardrooms replace imperial capitals as the real centers of command.
His choice of examples matters: GM signals industrial modernity and manufacturing muscle; Nestle evokes the everyday intimacy of consumer goods, the way corporate reach can penetrate kitchens and childhoods. Egypt, a “big country,” stands in as a symbol of geopolitical heft that still can’t compete with corporate balance sheets. The rhetorical move is to make listeners feel the humiliation of that mismatch, then recognize the stakes: if the biggest actors are no longer states, politics must either tame capital or be governed by it.
Ben Bella’s intent is bluntly political. As a leader shaped by anti-colonial struggle and the post-independence scramble to build a viable Algerian state, he is warning that liberation can be undone without a single soldier crossing a border. Multinationals can extract value, dictate terms, and reshape domestic priorities through investment, debt, supply chains, and access to technology. The subtext is that formal decolonization can be followed by economic captivity, where boardrooms replace imperial capitals as the real centers of command.
His choice of examples matters: GM signals industrial modernity and manufacturing muscle; Nestle evokes the everyday intimacy of consumer goods, the way corporate reach can penetrate kitchens and childhoods. Egypt, a “big country,” stands in as a symbol of geopolitical heft that still can’t compete with corporate balance sheets. The rhetorical move is to make listeners feel the humiliation of that mismatch, then recognize the stakes: if the biggest actors are no longer states, politics must either tame capital or be governed by it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Ahmed
Add to List
