"These endless legal challenges that define elections in New York are a joke in this country, and they are the reason why it is so expensive, or one of the reasons, it's so expensive to run here and why so many people decide not to run"
About this Quote
Bloomberg’s gripe isn’t really about paperwork; it’s about power. By calling New York’s “endless legal challenges” a “joke,” he frames a core feature of the city’s political ecosystem as not merely inefficient but illegitimate - a system that forces candidates to win twice: once with voters, and again in court.
The line works because it converts a procedural complaint into a moral one. “Endless” signals not just frequency but design, implying the challenges function as a gatekeeping tactic rather than a good-faith effort to protect electoral integrity. The subtext is blunt: incumbents, party machines, and well-lawyered interests can weaponize ballot access rules to bleed newcomers dry. In a city where campaigns already demand money, time, and media attention, the extra layer of litigation becomes a tax on ambition - and a selective one.
Bloomberg also slips in a business-minded argument about market distortion. Elections become “so expensive” not only because of ads and organizing, but because compliance and defense require legal teams. That’s a barrier that favors the wealthy, the connected, and the institutionally backed - a category Bloomberg, a billionaire with a technocratic brand, knows he fits. His “one of the reasons” aside is telling: he’s not claiming law is the only culprit, just the most absurd and avoidable one.
Contextually, this lands as a critique of New York’s famously byzantine ballot rules and petition challenges - a civic ritual where democracy gets filtered through attorneys before it reaches the public.
The line works because it converts a procedural complaint into a moral one. “Endless” signals not just frequency but design, implying the challenges function as a gatekeeping tactic rather than a good-faith effort to protect electoral integrity. The subtext is blunt: incumbents, party machines, and well-lawyered interests can weaponize ballot access rules to bleed newcomers dry. In a city where campaigns already demand money, time, and media attention, the extra layer of litigation becomes a tax on ambition - and a selective one.
Bloomberg also slips in a business-minded argument about market distortion. Elections become “so expensive” not only because of ads and organizing, but because compliance and defense require legal teams. That’s a barrier that favors the wealthy, the connected, and the institutionally backed - a category Bloomberg, a billionaire with a technocratic brand, knows he fits. His “one of the reasons” aside is telling: he’s not claiming law is the only culprit, just the most absurd and avoidable one.
Contextually, this lands as a critique of New York’s famously byzantine ballot rules and petition challenges - a civic ritual where democracy gets filtered through attorneys before it reaches the public.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List




