"They appear to have had a higher voter turnout in Iraq than we did in our recent federal elections, and we didn't have terrorists threatening to kill our families if we voted"
About this Quote
Burns is doing a neat rhetorical judo move: he uses Iraq’s turnout as a mirror, not to flatter a young democracy, but to shame an old one. The line lands because it flips the expected hierarchy. Americans are used to imagining civic participation as something we export; here, Iraqis become the standard-bearers for democratic courage while the U.S. looks complacent, even soft.
The specific intent is partisan but not narrow. Coming from a U.S. senator in the post-9/11, Iraq War era, it functions as validation-by-comparison: the war is implicitly framed as having produced something noble (people risking death to vote), which in turn justifies American sacrifice and policy. Yet the bite of the quote is aimed domestically. Burns isn’t really talking about Iraq; he’s talking about American disengagement, the kind that treats voting as optional because the stakes feel abstract. Avoiding “terrorists threatening to kill our families” is the point: comfort becomes indictment.
The subtext carries a second message: if Iraqis can show up under threat, then Americans who stay home are not merely apathetic, they’re failing a moral test. That’s a powerful framing because it turns turnout from a technocratic metric into a character referendum. It also sidesteps structural reasons people don’t vote - registration hurdles, gerrymandering, cynicism about representation - by recasting nonparticipation as a personal weakness. The line is effective because it’s clean, brutal, and emotionally legible. It’s also politically convenient: it makes civic virtue do the work that policy arguments can’t.
The specific intent is partisan but not narrow. Coming from a U.S. senator in the post-9/11, Iraq War era, it functions as validation-by-comparison: the war is implicitly framed as having produced something noble (people risking death to vote), which in turn justifies American sacrifice and policy. Yet the bite of the quote is aimed domestically. Burns isn’t really talking about Iraq; he’s talking about American disengagement, the kind that treats voting as optional because the stakes feel abstract. Avoiding “terrorists threatening to kill our families” is the point: comfort becomes indictment.
The subtext carries a second message: if Iraqis can show up under threat, then Americans who stay home are not merely apathetic, they’re failing a moral test. That’s a powerful framing because it turns turnout from a technocratic metric into a character referendum. It also sidesteps structural reasons people don’t vote - registration hurdles, gerrymandering, cynicism about representation - by recasting nonparticipation as a personal weakness. The line is effective because it’s clean, brutal, and emotionally legible. It’s also politically convenient: it makes civic virtue do the work that policy arguments can’t.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Conrad
Add to List



