"They are few in the midst of an overwhelming mass of brute force, and their submission is wisdom; but for a nation like England to submit to be robbed by any invader who chooses to visit her shores seemed to me to be nonsense"

In this quote, George Combe engages with an extensive exploration of the dynamics in between power and submission. His words immediately draw a difference in between 2 groups: a little, vulnerable minority and an effective, well-established nation like England. Combe acknowledges the reality that for groups or countries that are relatively weak when confronted with a frustrating force, submission can be a strategic and sensible choice. This kind of submission is not born out of intrinsic weakness or cowardice but rather a calculated choice for survival.

On the other hand, Combe contrasts this with a review of the idea that an effective nation, exhibited by England, need to catch foreign intruders. His usage of the word "rubbish" highlights his belief that England, with its storied history, resources, and ability, stands in plain opposition to vulnerability. The notion that such a nation would capitulate to external aggressiveness is, to him, irrational and ridiculous.

Through this analysis, Combe might be encouraging nations with substantial strength and resources to persevere against external hazards rather than selecting submission which would be more suitable to less effective entities. His remark conjures up a sense of nationwide pride and obligation, recommending that the inherent benefits of a nation like England should mobilize its individuals to protect its sovereignty resolutely.

This dissection likewise shows the more comprehensive 19th-century context in which nationwide identity and integrity were front and center, and where royal and colonial stories prevailed. Combe's quote serves as a reflection on the tactical knowledge in the face of overpowering odds while at the same time promoting a durable and proactive stance for those with the methods to effectively resist subjugation. His dual message speaks to both pragmatism and the requirement for a courageous defense of one's homeland when fairly possible.