"They divided the city into three electoral wards, and in one ward there was 70 percent of the people, the Catholic population, and they elected eight representatives to the city council"
About this Quote
A bureaucratic sentence that lands like an indictment: the math is the message. John Hume isn’t describing a quirky municipal map; he’s staging a quiet expose of how power gets laundered through procedure. “They divided the city” puts the agency up front - an unnamed “they” with the authority to redraw reality. The next clause delivers the blunt statistic, “70 percent of the people,” and then, almost as if the numbers aren’t damning enough, he specifies “the Catholic population,” pinning the maneuver to Northern Ireland’s sectarian fault line. What follows is the punchline: eight representatives. Not eight out of what? He doesn’t need to say. The omission forces the listener to supply the missing comparison and feel the imbalance as a lived injustice rather than a technicality.
Hume’s intent is practical and moral at once: to show that discrimination doesn’t always announce itself with slogans or police batons. It can wear the neutral face of “electoral wards,” turning majorities into minorities at the level that governs housing, jobs, and daily dignity. The subtext is accusation without theatricality - a politician’s version of courtroom rhetoric. He doesn’t rage; he enumerates. That restraint is strategic, aimed at audiences who might dismiss overt outrage but can’t easily argue with arithmetic.
In context, this is the architecture of gerrymandering and systemic exclusion in places like Derry/Londonderry, where ward boundaries were used to lock Catholic communities out of local control. Hume’s line turns a map into evidence, and makes “representation” sound like what it can become: a rigged counting trick.
Hume’s intent is practical and moral at once: to show that discrimination doesn’t always announce itself with slogans or police batons. It can wear the neutral face of “electoral wards,” turning majorities into minorities at the level that governs housing, jobs, and daily dignity. The subtext is accusation without theatricality - a politician’s version of courtroom rhetoric. He doesn’t rage; he enumerates. That restraint is strategic, aimed at audiences who might dismiss overt outrage but can’t easily argue with arithmetic.
In context, this is the architecture of gerrymandering and systemic exclusion in places like Derry/Londonderry, where ward boundaries were used to lock Catholic communities out of local control. Hume’s line turns a map into evidence, and makes “representation” sound like what it can become: a rigged counting trick.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List





