"They have accorded me my constitutional rights, and that is to their credit because the media hate campaign against me has been so intense and so vicious that it's a miracle that the police have taken such a professional approach"
About this Quote
The line is a studied piece of victimhood rhetoric, engineered to turn procedural neutrality into moral vindication. Zundel doesn’t argue his case; he frames the mere fact of being treated according to law as evidence that shadowy forces wanted him denied it. That move matters: it shifts attention from what he’s accused of to the supposed illegitimacy of everyone scrutinizing him.
His “constitutional rights” are invoked less as a civic principle than as a shield with a halo. By praising the police for a “professional approach,” he manufactures a contrast: the state, at least at street level, is fair; the media, by contrast, are a “hate campaign.” The phrase is deliberate inversion. “Hate” is a word commonly attached to extremist politics; he flips it onto journalists, laundering himself into the posture of the persecuted dissident. “Intense” and “vicious” do emotional work, inviting the audience to feel threatened on his behalf without naming any specific reporting, claims, or corrections.
The “miracle” line is the tell. It implies that the police were under enormous pressure to behave unlawfully - pressure orchestrated by the media - and resisted. That insinuation plants suspicion of institutions while pretending to compliment them, a classic strategy for mobilizing supporters: trust is selectively extended to whatever seems to validate him, while criticism is pre-labeled as hatred.
Contextually, this kind of statement thrives when a figure facing legal or public accountability needs a counter-narrative that travels faster than facts. It’s less a defense than a preemptive strike: if coverage is “hate,” then rebuttals can be dismissed as persecution rather than engagement.
His “constitutional rights” are invoked less as a civic principle than as a shield with a halo. By praising the police for a “professional approach,” he manufactures a contrast: the state, at least at street level, is fair; the media, by contrast, are a “hate campaign.” The phrase is deliberate inversion. “Hate” is a word commonly attached to extremist politics; he flips it onto journalists, laundering himself into the posture of the persecuted dissident. “Intense” and “vicious” do emotional work, inviting the audience to feel threatened on his behalf without naming any specific reporting, claims, or corrections.
The “miracle” line is the tell. It implies that the police were under enormous pressure to behave unlawfully - pressure orchestrated by the media - and resisted. That insinuation plants suspicion of institutions while pretending to compliment them, a classic strategy for mobilizing supporters: trust is selectively extended to whatever seems to validate him, while criticism is pre-labeled as hatred.
Contextually, this kind of statement thrives when a figure facing legal or public accountability needs a counter-narrative that travels faster than facts. It’s less a defense than a preemptive strike: if coverage is “hate,” then rebuttals can be dismissed as persecution rather than engagement.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Ernst
Add to List
