"They might in the future more than ever before engage in hunting beavers"
About this Quote
A line like this looks quaint until you hear the machinery behind it: “They might in the future more than ever before engage in hunting beavers” is Champlain speaking in the cool, managerial voice of early empire. The beaver isn’t an animal here so much as a unit of value, a forecastable resource. “In the future” and “more than ever before” are the telltale phrases of investment language, smuggled into travel narrative: he’s not merely observing Indigenous life, he’s projecting an economic program onto it.
Champlain wrote at a moment when France’s North American ambitions were inseparable from the fur trade. Beaver pelts, driven by European fashion (felt hats weren’t a hobby; they were a market), offered a lucrative rationale for settlement, alliances, and logistics. So the sentence carries two audiences at once. On the surface, it reads like ethnographic curiosity. Underneath, it reassures patrons and officials that the colony can be made profitable and, crucially, that Native nations can be enrolled into that profitability as suppliers.
The subtext is a strategy of persuasion: “they” are framed as potential labor and partners in a French commercial ecosystem, while “engage” sanitizes what will become pressure, dependency, and ecological strain. Champlain’s restraint is the rhetoric; he doesn’t need to announce conquest when he can describe an expanding hunt as simply sensible, even inevitable. It’s colonialism rendered as a business plan, one pelt at a time.
Champlain wrote at a moment when France’s North American ambitions were inseparable from the fur trade. Beaver pelts, driven by European fashion (felt hats weren’t a hobby; they were a market), offered a lucrative rationale for settlement, alliances, and logistics. So the sentence carries two audiences at once. On the surface, it reads like ethnographic curiosity. Underneath, it reassures patrons and officials that the colony can be made profitable and, crucially, that Native nations can be enrolled into that profitability as suppliers.
The subtext is a strategy of persuasion: “they” are framed as potential labor and partners in a French commercial ecosystem, while “engage” sanitizes what will become pressure, dependency, and ecological strain. Champlain’s restraint is the rhetoric; he doesn’t need to announce conquest when he can describe an expanding hunt as simply sensible, even inevitable. It’s colonialism rendered as a business plan, one pelt at a time.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|
More Quotes by Samuel
Add to List
