"They rushed to move it forward, uh, and then a lawsuit was filed and we spent many months litigating, rather than trying to come up with legislation and move forward on that front"
About this Quote
You can hear the telltale sound of government grinding its gears: the stumble ("uh"), the passive voice ("a lawsuit was filed"), the vague horizon of "move forward". Tom Udall isn’t delivering poetry here; he’s offering a field report from the swampy middle of policymaking, where intent gets rerouted into procedure and time is the most expensive currency.
The specific intent is defensive clarity. Udall frames a sequence in which "they" rushed something, litigation followed, and the result was months lost. He’s distributing blame without naming names, a classic political move that keeps alliances intact while still signaling to constituents: this wasn’t supposed to go like this. The phrasing also recasts litigation as a kind of civic detour, not a legitimate arena of democratic conflict. That’s the subtext: courts are portrayed as a drain on productive governance, an alternative to the "real" work of legislation.
What makes it work is its quiet indictment of incentives. "Rushed" implies process shortcuts, perhaps overreach. The lawsuit becomes an almost inevitable consequence, suggesting a system where speed triggers backlash and backlash triggers paralysis. Udall’s contrast - litigating versus legislating - is rhetorical triage: he’s arguing for a return to the elected branch’s authority, but also acknowledging how easily that authority is abdicated when politics gets hard.
Contextually, this is the language of a lawmaker trying to translate institutional failure into a narrative of interrupted progress. It’s less a confession than a plea: stop turning every policy fight into a court case, or at least stop pretending that governance can survive on procedural warfare alone.
The specific intent is defensive clarity. Udall frames a sequence in which "they" rushed something, litigation followed, and the result was months lost. He’s distributing blame without naming names, a classic political move that keeps alliances intact while still signaling to constituents: this wasn’t supposed to go like this. The phrasing also recasts litigation as a kind of civic detour, not a legitimate arena of democratic conflict. That’s the subtext: courts are portrayed as a drain on productive governance, an alternative to the "real" work of legislation.
What makes it work is its quiet indictment of incentives. "Rushed" implies process shortcuts, perhaps overreach. The lawsuit becomes an almost inevitable consequence, suggesting a system where speed triggers backlash and backlash triggers paralysis. Udall’s contrast - litigating versus legislating - is rhetorical triage: he’s arguing for a return to the elected branch’s authority, but also acknowledging how easily that authority is abdicated when politics gets hard.
Contextually, this is the language of a lawmaker trying to translate institutional failure into a narrative of interrupted progress. It’s less a confession than a plea: stop turning every policy fight into a court case, or at least stop pretending that governance can survive on procedural warfare alone.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List

