"They take journalism really seriously because they know the force that it is and can be"
About this Quote
Amanpour’s line is a compliment with teeth: the kind of praise that also functions as a warning label. “They” aren’t just diligent colleagues or admirably strict editors; they’re usually power brokers who understand that journalism isn’t décor in a democracy, it’s leverage. The key move is her framing of seriousness as strategic literacy. Authoritarians don’t fear journalists because reporters are glamorous. They fear them because facts, assembled into narrative and broadcast at scale, can reorganize public reality.
The sentence is built on a double time signature: “is and can be.” Journalism already has force in the present tense, but its future-tense potential is what triggers control. That “can be” hints at the conditions under which reporting becomes a genuine civic weapon: access, protection, distribution, and public trust. It also implies fragility. If journalism can be force, it can also be neutralized - by intimidation, lawsuits, disinformation, ownership capture, or the slow bleed of audience cynicism.
There’s subtext here about misplaced seriousness in freer societies. Where the press is treated as content, a lifestyle vertical, or partisan ammo, it’s easy to forget its coercive capacity: to expose, to embarrass, to force resignations, to constrain policy. Amanpour has spent her career in conflict zones and under regimes that police narratives like borders. Her point lands as a rebuke to complacency: the people most threatened by journalism behave as if it matters because it does.
The sentence is built on a double time signature: “is and can be.” Journalism already has force in the present tense, but its future-tense potential is what triggers control. That “can be” hints at the conditions under which reporting becomes a genuine civic weapon: access, protection, distribution, and public trust. It also implies fragility. If journalism can be force, it can also be neutralized - by intimidation, lawsuits, disinformation, ownership capture, or the slow bleed of audience cynicism.
There’s subtext here about misplaced seriousness in freer societies. Where the press is treated as content, a lifestyle vertical, or partisan ammo, it’s easy to forget its coercive capacity: to expose, to embarrass, to force resignations, to constrain policy. Amanpour has spent her career in conflict zones and under regimes that police narratives like borders. Her point lands as a rebuke to complacency: the people most threatened by journalism behave as if it matters because it does.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Christiane
Add to List
