"Things happen in American politics in the political center. If the President will meet us in the center, there are things we can accomplish"
About this Quote
“Things happen in American politics in the political center” is less a description than a claim of ownership. McConnell frames “the center” as the only legitimate place where governance occurs, then positions himself as its gatekeeper: progress is available, but only if the President comes to where McConnell says the middle is. It’s a soft-sounding power move, dressed up as civics.
The line works because it smuggles in asymmetry. “Meet us in the center” implies two equal sides compromising. In practice, it can function as a ratchet: one party defines the starting line far from the midpoint, then calls the halfway point “the center” and demands the other side walk there. The subtext isn’t cooperation; it’s conditional permission. “There are things we can accomplish” reads like a promise, but it’s also a threat: don’t, and nothing moves.
Context matters because McConnell’s political brand is procedural leverage - controlling the Senate calendar, nominations, and the terms under which anything gets a vote. When he invokes “the center,” he’s not making a philosophical argument about moderation. He’s advertising the Senate’s veto points as a negotiating weapon, recasting obstruction as responsibility.
It’s also a shrewd public-relations hedge. If talks fail, the blame can be assigned to a President who “refused the center,” even if the actual sticking point was specific policy. The genius here is how banal it sounds: a civics-class sentiment that doubles as a map of who has to bend first.
The line works because it smuggles in asymmetry. “Meet us in the center” implies two equal sides compromising. In practice, it can function as a ratchet: one party defines the starting line far from the midpoint, then calls the halfway point “the center” and demands the other side walk there. The subtext isn’t cooperation; it’s conditional permission. “There are things we can accomplish” reads like a promise, but it’s also a threat: don’t, and nothing moves.
Context matters because McConnell’s political brand is procedural leverage - controlling the Senate calendar, nominations, and the terms under which anything gets a vote. When he invokes “the center,” he’s not making a philosophical argument about moderation. He’s advertising the Senate’s veto points as a negotiating weapon, recasting obstruction as responsibility.
It’s also a shrewd public-relations hedge. If talks fail, the blame can be assigned to a President who “refused the center,” even if the actual sticking point was specific policy. The genius here is how banal it sounds: a civics-class sentiment that doubles as a map of who has to bend first.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|
More Quotes by Mitch
Add to List




