"Things must be done by parties, not by persons using parties as tools"
About this Quote
Disraeli is smuggling a warning inside a piece of organizational advice: in a constitutional system, power has to be legible. “Parties” aren’t just electoral machines; they’re accountability structures. If policy is made by a recognizable team with a shared program, the public can reward or punish it. If policy is made by a charismatic operator who merely rents a party label, the whole system becomes a shell game.
The line carries Disraeli’s insider realism about 19th-century Britain, when modern mass parties were hardening out of loose factions and patronage networks. As a Conservative leader who helped remake his party into something capable of winning in an expanding electorate, he understood that a durable “party” disciplines ambition. It forces compromise, creates continuity between elections, and turns governing from personal rule into something closer to a contract.
The subtext is also a jab at opportunism. Disraeli had watched politicians treat parties as disposable vehicles: bolt when convenient, flatter the base when necessary, call it principle either way. His phrasing reverses the romantic idea of the great man steering history. “Persons using parties as tools” is the profile of the demagogue or the careerist: someone who wants the advantages of collective legitimacy without the constraints of collective responsibility.
It works because it frames party politics not as a regrettable necessity but as a safeguard. Disraeli doesn’t pretend parties are pure; he insists they’re preferable to politics organized around ego, intrigue, and improvisation. In that sense, it’s less a defense of parties than a defense of accountable power.
The line carries Disraeli’s insider realism about 19th-century Britain, when modern mass parties were hardening out of loose factions and patronage networks. As a Conservative leader who helped remake his party into something capable of winning in an expanding electorate, he understood that a durable “party” disciplines ambition. It forces compromise, creates continuity between elections, and turns governing from personal rule into something closer to a contract.
The subtext is also a jab at opportunism. Disraeli had watched politicians treat parties as disposable vehicles: bolt when convenient, flatter the base when necessary, call it principle either way. His phrasing reverses the romantic idea of the great man steering history. “Persons using parties as tools” is the profile of the demagogue or the careerist: someone who wants the advantages of collective legitimacy without the constraints of collective responsibility.
It works because it frames party politics not as a regrettable necessity but as a safeguard. Disraeli doesn’t pretend parties are pure; he insists they’re preferable to politics organized around ego, intrigue, and improvisation. In that sense, it’s less a defense of parties than a defense of accountable power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|
More Quotes by Benjamin
Add to List
