"This Bush administration has a growing credibility gap, maybe even a credibility chasm, on environmental policy. The President has lost the trust of the American people when it comes to the environment"
About this Quote
“Credibility gap” is Washington’s polite term for “we think you’re lying,” and Jeffords sharpens it with a neat escalation: gap, then chasm. The move is rhetorical, but it’s also strategic. A gap can be spun, bridged, patched with a new initiative. A chasm suggests structural collapse: the problem isn’t one bad decision, it’s a governing posture.
Jeffords’s intent is less to litigate a single regulation than to reframe environmental policy as a trust issue. That matters because the environment often gets treated as technocratic minutiae - emissions baselines, cost-benefit models, rulemaking timelines. He drags it back into the moral-political arena where presidents win or lose legitimacy. “Lost the trust of the American people” is deliberately majoritarian language; it casts skepticism toward the White House not as partisan fussiness but as a public verdict.
The subtext is an indictment of a familiar early-2000s pattern: campaign assurances followed by industry-friendly reversals and opaque decision-making. Jeffords is also positioning himself as a custodian of institutional sanity, implying that the administration’s problem isn’t just policy outcomes but a disregard for transparency and good faith. Coming from a Republican-turned-independent who famously broke with his party around this period, the critique carries an extra sting: it’s framed as a rupture born of conscience, not convenience.
In that context, “environment” becomes shorthand for a broader worry about governance: if the White House can’t be believed on the air you breathe and the water you drink, what else is negotiable?
Jeffords’s intent is less to litigate a single regulation than to reframe environmental policy as a trust issue. That matters because the environment often gets treated as technocratic minutiae - emissions baselines, cost-benefit models, rulemaking timelines. He drags it back into the moral-political arena where presidents win or lose legitimacy. “Lost the trust of the American people” is deliberately majoritarian language; it casts skepticism toward the White House not as partisan fussiness but as a public verdict.
The subtext is an indictment of a familiar early-2000s pattern: campaign assurances followed by industry-friendly reversals and opaque decision-making. Jeffords is also positioning himself as a custodian of institutional sanity, implying that the administration’s problem isn’t just policy outcomes but a disregard for transparency and good faith. Coming from a Republican-turned-independent who famously broke with his party around this period, the critique carries an extra sting: it’s framed as a rupture born of conscience, not convenience.
In that context, “environment” becomes shorthand for a broader worry about governance: if the White House can’t be believed on the air you breathe and the water you drink, what else is negotiable?
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|
More Quotes by Jim
Add to List
