"This desire for equity must not lead to an excess of welfare, where nobody is responsible for anything"
About this Quote
Delors is doing a classic European tightrope act: praising “equity” while policing the boundary where solidarity allegedly curdles into irresponsibility. The line is built to reassure two audiences at once. To social democrats, he affirms the moral legitimacy of redistribution. To skeptics of the welfare state, he offers a crisp warning that sounds like common sense: too much protection, and accountability dissolves.
The operative word is “excess.” It’s vague enough to be politically useful, a rhetorical hinge that can swing left or right depending on who’s wielding it. “Excess of welfare” isn’t a measurable condition; it’s a fear-image. It suggests a society padded by benefits, insulated from consequences, where obligations are outsourced to the state. The subtext is less about actual policy design than about legitimacy: welfare must be justified not only by outcomes (reduced poverty, stability) but by its ability to preserve a moral economy of effort, duty, and contribution.
Context matters: Delors is associated with the postwar European project that tried to fuse market integration with a social model. In that world, the welfare state isn’t just charity; it’s social insurance, a pact that keeps capitalism governable. His warning reads as an attempt to keep that pact intact by preempting the most corrosive critique: that welfare breeds dependency and erodes civic responsibility.
The cleverness is that it makes responsibility sound apolitical, like gravity. But “nobody is responsible for anything” also smuggles in a contested assumption: that insecurity is the primary engine of responsibility, and that cushioning life’s shocks necessarily dulls agency. That’s an argument about human nature disguised as budget prudence.
The operative word is “excess.” It’s vague enough to be politically useful, a rhetorical hinge that can swing left or right depending on who’s wielding it. “Excess of welfare” isn’t a measurable condition; it’s a fear-image. It suggests a society padded by benefits, insulated from consequences, where obligations are outsourced to the state. The subtext is less about actual policy design than about legitimacy: welfare must be justified not only by outcomes (reduced poverty, stability) but by its ability to preserve a moral economy of effort, duty, and contribution.
Context matters: Delors is associated with the postwar European project that tried to fuse market integration with a social model. In that world, the welfare state isn’t just charity; it’s social insurance, a pact that keeps capitalism governable. His warning reads as an attempt to keep that pact intact by preempting the most corrosive critique: that welfare breeds dependency and erodes civic responsibility.
The cleverness is that it makes responsibility sound apolitical, like gravity. But “nobody is responsible for anything” also smuggles in a contested assumption: that insecurity is the primary engine of responsibility, and that cushioning life’s shocks necessarily dulls agency. That’s an argument about human nature disguised as budget prudence.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Jacques
Add to List
