"This double burden of disease is rapidly putting a serious brake on the development efforts of many countries"
About this Quote
“Double burden” is an economist’s phrase smuggled into public health, and that’s the point. Brundtland isn’t describing illness as a private tragedy; she’s reframing it as a structural drag force on national ambition. The metaphor of a “serious brake” does more than warn of harm. It implies motion already underway - countries pushing toward growth, education, stability - and then a sudden, grinding resistance that turns progress into exhaustion.
In context, Brundtland’s era as a global health leader coincided with a sharp realization: many low- and middle-income countries were being hit from both sides. Infectious diseases like HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis remained devastating, while non-communicable diseases - diabetes, heart disease, cancers - rose with urbanization, changing diets, tobacco marketing, and longer lifespans. “Double burden” compresses that messy epidemiological transition into a tidy, urgent diagnosis.
The subtext is political leverage. By tying disease directly to “development efforts,” she’s speaking in the dialect of finance ministries and international donors, not just doctors. It’s a bid to move health spending from the moral category (charity, compassion) into the strategic one (investment, security, competitiveness). The line also contains a quiet rebuke: if development models ignore health systems, labor conditions, and corporate risk factors, they’ll generate growth on paper while quietly sabotaging the human capacity needed to sustain it. Brundtland’s intent is to make health unavoidable in the development agenda - not an add-on, but a limiting factor.
In context, Brundtland’s era as a global health leader coincided with a sharp realization: many low- and middle-income countries were being hit from both sides. Infectious diseases like HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis remained devastating, while non-communicable diseases - diabetes, heart disease, cancers - rose with urbanization, changing diets, tobacco marketing, and longer lifespans. “Double burden” compresses that messy epidemiological transition into a tidy, urgent diagnosis.
The subtext is political leverage. By tying disease directly to “development efforts,” she’s speaking in the dialect of finance ministries and international donors, not just doctors. It’s a bid to move health spending from the moral category (charity, compassion) into the strategic one (investment, security, competitiveness). The line also contains a quiet rebuke: if development models ignore health systems, labor conditions, and corporate risk factors, they’ll generate growth on paper while quietly sabotaging the human capacity needed to sustain it. Brundtland’s intent is to make health unavoidable in the development agenda - not an add-on, but a limiting factor.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|
More Quotes by Gro
Add to List

