"This foundational principle - that human beings derive their rights from God, rather than from the State, or any other source - is what made America different"
About this Quote
There is a reason this line sounds less like a policy pitch and more like a creed: Fletcher is trying to relocate American identity from the messy arena of democratic bargaining to a higher court. By insisting rights come from God rather than the state, he frames liberty as pre-political - something government can recognize but never legitimately grant. That rhetorical move matters because it turns political disagreement into moral trespass. If rights are divine in origin, then opponents are not just wrong on the merits; they are flirting with sacrilege, or at least with the dangerous idea that power defines justice.
The intent is defensive and mobilizing at once. It reassures religious conservatives that their worldview is not merely compatible with the American project but constitutive of it, while warning that secular governance risks becoming an idol. The phrasing "foundational principle" invokes the Founding as a kind of authorized text, skirting the actual legal complexity of American rights (which are enforced through courts, statutes, and constitutional amendments - very state-shaped instruments). "Made America different" does the cultural work of boundary-drawing: authentic America over here; the rest - Europe, secular liberalism, moral relativism - over there.
Contextually, this fits the late-20th/early-21st century Republican vocabulary in which "God-given rights" is both historical reference (natural rights language in the Declaration) and contemporary litmus test. It's a way to claim permanence in an age of social change: if rights are fixed by God, then the loudest question becomes not what society owes its people next, but who is trying to rewrite what was never theirs to write.
The intent is defensive and mobilizing at once. It reassures religious conservatives that their worldview is not merely compatible with the American project but constitutive of it, while warning that secular governance risks becoming an idol. The phrasing "foundational principle" invokes the Founding as a kind of authorized text, skirting the actual legal complexity of American rights (which are enforced through courts, statutes, and constitutional amendments - very state-shaped instruments). "Made America different" does the cultural work of boundary-drawing: authentic America over here; the rest - Europe, secular liberalism, moral relativism - over there.
Contextually, this fits the late-20th/early-21st century Republican vocabulary in which "God-given rights" is both historical reference (natural rights language in the Declaration) and contemporary litmus test. It's a way to claim permanence in an age of social change: if rights are fixed by God, then the loudest question becomes not what society owes its people next, but who is trying to rewrite what was never theirs to write.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Ernie
Add to List


