"This girl wanted me to experience something I'd never experienced. She tried three times to get me high. Finally it worked, and I had the most incredible sex I'd ever had"
About this Quote
Herer doesn’t dress this up as policy or medicine; he sells it as a conversion story with sweat on it. The line reads like a locker-room confessional, but the craft is deliberate: repetition ("She tried three times") sets up resistance, then the breakthrough lands as revelation. It’s activism by anecdote, smuggling a broader argument into a tale of seduction, persistence, and payoff.
The specific intent is to normalize getting high by anchoring it to an experience most people already understand as legitimate: desire. Instead of debating cannabinoids, he centers consent, curiosity, and the intimate stakes of trying something new. The subtext is clear: cannabis isn’t a criminal vice or a moral failure; it’s a portal to heightened sensation, connection, maybe even truth. That’s classic Herer, whose larger project was reframing hemp and marijuana as unfairly demonized, culturally valuable, and politically suppressed.
Context matters because this is activism from the counterculture tradition, where personal liberation is treated as political evidence. The "girl" functions less as a person than as a narrative device: the initiator who introduces the reluctant subject to an outlaw pleasure. That dynamic both flatters the reader (you, too, could be the skeptic turned enlightened) and risks reducing women to catalysts in a male awakening.
The rhetorical gamble is that it’s messy, bodily, and unrespectable on purpose. Herer is betting that pleasure is a stronger solvent than argument: if prohibition depends on shame, then an ecstatic, unashamed memory becomes its own kind of propaganda.
The specific intent is to normalize getting high by anchoring it to an experience most people already understand as legitimate: desire. Instead of debating cannabinoids, he centers consent, curiosity, and the intimate stakes of trying something new. The subtext is clear: cannabis isn’t a criminal vice or a moral failure; it’s a portal to heightened sensation, connection, maybe even truth. That’s classic Herer, whose larger project was reframing hemp and marijuana as unfairly demonized, culturally valuable, and politically suppressed.
Context matters because this is activism from the counterculture tradition, where personal liberation is treated as political evidence. The "girl" functions less as a person than as a narrative device: the initiator who introduces the reluctant subject to an outlaw pleasure. That dynamic both flatters the reader (you, too, could be the skeptic turned enlightened) and risks reducing women to catalysts in a male awakening.
The rhetorical gamble is that it’s messy, bodily, and unrespectable on purpose. Herer is betting that pleasure is a stronger solvent than argument: if prohibition depends on shame, then an ecstatic, unashamed memory becomes its own kind of propaganda.
Quote Details
| Topic | Romantic |
|---|
More Quotes by Jack
Add to List




