"This implies that the laws governing organic cohesion, the organization leading from the part to the whole, represent a biological uncertainty, indeed an uncertainty of the first order"
About this Quote
Hess is smuggling a quiet bomb into the tidy machinery of early 20th-century biology: the idea that “organic cohesion” isn’t just complicated, it is structurally uncertain. Not unknown because we haven’t measured enough, but uncertain in the way weather is uncertain - you can model tendencies, yet the leap from parts to a functioning whole resists being reduced to a ledger of components.
The phrasing matters. “Organization leading from the part to the whole” frames life as an emergent process, not a sum. And by calling the governing laws a “biological uncertainty… of the first order,” Hess borrows the prestige and sting of physics-language (think fundamental limits, not temporary gaps). It’s a rhetorical move that elevates the problem of living systems to the same category as the deepest constraints in science, while warning against the era’s growing faith that physiology could be fully mechanized.
Context sharpens the intent. Hess, a Nobel-winning physiologist associated with mapping the autonomic nervous system, knew intimately how localized interventions could produce global, organism-level shifts: sleep, arousal, blood pressure, behavior. His career was a tutorial in how the organism refuses to stay neatly partitioned. The subtext is a critique of reductionism delivered from inside the lab: even if you catalog every nerve pathway, “cohesion” - the coordinated unity that makes an organism an organism - remains a moving target.
It’s also a claim about scientific humility. Hess isn’t retreating into mysticism; he’s marking a boundary where explanation must grapple with organization itself as a primary object, not an afterthought.
The phrasing matters. “Organization leading from the part to the whole” frames life as an emergent process, not a sum. And by calling the governing laws a “biological uncertainty… of the first order,” Hess borrows the prestige and sting of physics-language (think fundamental limits, not temporary gaps). It’s a rhetorical move that elevates the problem of living systems to the same category as the deepest constraints in science, while warning against the era’s growing faith that physiology could be fully mechanized.
Context sharpens the intent. Hess, a Nobel-winning physiologist associated with mapping the autonomic nervous system, knew intimately how localized interventions could produce global, organism-level shifts: sleep, arousal, blood pressure, behavior. His career was a tutorial in how the organism refuses to stay neatly partitioned. The subtext is a critique of reductionism delivered from inside the lab: even if you catalog every nerve pathway, “cohesion” - the coordinated unity that makes an organism an organism - remains a moving target.
It’s also a claim about scientific humility. Hess isn’t retreating into mysticism; he’s marking a boundary where explanation must grapple with organization itself as a primary object, not an afterthought.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Walter
Add to List

