"This is appalling. The idea that a person could be punished because of their religious belief and the idea they might be executed is just beyond belief"
About this Quote
Appalling is doing double duty here: it’s moral outrage, but it’s also political positioning. John Howard, a careful conservative by instinct, reaches for language that feels almost uncharacteristically naked. “Beyond belief” isn’t just a phrase; it’s a neat rhetorical echo of the subject itself. He’s condemning punishment for “religious belief” while using the language of disbelief to mark the act as outside the boundaries of a civilized order. It’s a way of saying: whatever our differences, this isn’t the kind of world we’re supposed to live in.
The construction is strategic. He doesn’t name a country, a regime, or even a specific case in the line you’ve given. That vagueness is not a flaw; it’s the point. It allows him to signal a principle - religious freedom as a baseline human right - without locking Australia into a detailed diplomatic posture in the same breath. “The idea that a person could be punished” foregrounds the individual victim, not the theology, which widens the circle of identification and keeps the statement legible to secular audiences, too.
Subtextually, it’s also a rebuke aimed at any temptation to relativize. The pairing of “punished” and “executed” escalates from injustice to irreversible brutality, forcing listeners to treat the issue as urgent rather than abstract. Coming from a statesman associated with security-first politics, the line carries extra weight: it implies there are limits even national interest shouldn’t negotiate away.
The construction is strategic. He doesn’t name a country, a regime, or even a specific case in the line you’ve given. That vagueness is not a flaw; it’s the point. It allows him to signal a principle - religious freedom as a baseline human right - without locking Australia into a detailed diplomatic posture in the same breath. “The idea that a person could be punished” foregrounds the individual victim, not the theology, which widens the circle of identification and keeps the statement legible to secular audiences, too.
Subtextually, it’s also a rebuke aimed at any temptation to relativize. The pairing of “punished” and “executed” escalates from injustice to irreversible brutality, forcing listeners to treat the issue as urgent rather than abstract. Coming from a statesman associated with security-first politics, the line carries extra weight: it implies there are limits even national interest shouldn’t negotiate away.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List






