"This is still a man's profession, with a lot of men who intellectually and emotionally have not accepted that the military could be women's work"
About this Quote
Korb’s line lands like a diagnosis, not a slogan: the problem isn’t whether women can do the job; it’s that too many men in the institution haven’t metabolized the idea that they already are. By calling the military “a man’s profession,” he’s naming culture as infrastructure. Policy can open doors, recruitment can hit targets, but an organization still runs on who gets believed, promoted, protected, and quietly pushed out. The sting is in “intellectually and emotionally.” He’s not letting the holdouts pretend it’s mere tradition or “standards.” He’s arguing the resistance is cognitive (the mental model of soldiering as male) and affective (status anxiety, resentment, fear of losing a monopoly on honor and authority).
The phrase “women’s work” is a deliberate provocation. It flips a loaded cultural tag, usually used to belittle feminized labor, and applies it to the most mythologized masculine arena in American life. That inversion exposes what’s really being defended: not combat effectiveness, but a gendered prestige economy where military service functions as a credential for leadership and citizenship. If women fully belong there, the old story about who gets to be “protector” and who gets cast as “protected” collapses.
Contextually, Korb is speaking from within the national security conversation, where integration debates often get laundered through neutral-sounding talk of cohesion and readiness. He strips away the euphemisms and points at the unspoken center: acceptance isn’t a bureaucratic checkbox; it’s a confrontation with identity, power, and the institution’s self-image.
The phrase “women’s work” is a deliberate provocation. It flips a loaded cultural tag, usually used to belittle feminized labor, and applies it to the most mythologized masculine arena in American life. That inversion exposes what’s really being defended: not combat effectiveness, but a gendered prestige economy where military service functions as a credential for leadership and citizenship. If women fully belong there, the old story about who gets to be “protector” and who gets cast as “protected” collapses.
Contextually, Korb is speaking from within the national security conversation, where integration debates often get laundered through neutral-sounding talk of cohesion and readiness. He strips away the euphemisms and points at the unspoken center: acceptance isn’t a bureaucratic checkbox; it’s a confrontation with identity, power, and the institution’s self-image.
Quote Details
| Topic | Military & Soldier |
|---|
More Quotes by Lawrence
Add to List







