"This is the absolute truth: and on this truth our tactics must be based. All tactics that are not based on this are false, and lead the proletariat to terrible defeat"
About this Quote
Certainty is doing the heavy lifting here. Gorter doesn’t just argue a point; he tries to foreclose argument itself, staking out “absolute truth” as a kind of political high ground from which every competing strategy can be condemned in advance. For a poet turned revolutionary polemicist, the move is telling: it’s lyrical in its cadence, but prosecutorial in its logic. The line is built like a drumbeat - truth, tactics, falsity, defeat - turning political debate into a morality play where only one script ends without catastrophe.
The intent is disciplinary. By insisting that tactics must be “based” on a singular truth, Gorter is policing the boundary between authentic proletarian politics and the temptations of compromise. The subtext is anxiety about dilution: reformism, parliamentary maneuvering, or collaboration with bourgeois institutions don’t merely fail; they become “false” and therefore dangerous. That’s not just intellectual disagreement. It’s an attempt to inoculate a movement against pragmatism by framing pragmatism as betrayal.
Context sharpens the edge. Gorter is associated with the left-communist current in early 20th-century Europe, a moment when socialist movements were fracturing under the pressures of war, revolution, and the question of how power should actually be taken and held. “Terrible defeat” isn’t abstract; it’s the specter of 1914-style collapse, of parties voting for war credits, of worker energy being rerouted into national or institutional channels. The rhetorical trick is elegant and ruthless: if you lose, it proves you were false; if you disagree, it proves you’re not grounded in truth. That’s how a slogan becomes a gate.
The intent is disciplinary. By insisting that tactics must be “based” on a singular truth, Gorter is policing the boundary between authentic proletarian politics and the temptations of compromise. The subtext is anxiety about dilution: reformism, parliamentary maneuvering, or collaboration with bourgeois institutions don’t merely fail; they become “false” and therefore dangerous. That’s not just intellectual disagreement. It’s an attempt to inoculate a movement against pragmatism by framing pragmatism as betrayal.
Context sharpens the edge. Gorter is associated with the left-communist current in early 20th-century Europe, a moment when socialist movements were fracturing under the pressures of war, revolution, and the question of how power should actually be taken and held. “Terrible defeat” isn’t abstract; it’s the specter of 1914-style collapse, of parties voting for war credits, of worker energy being rerouted into national or institutional channels. The rhetorical trick is elegant and ruthless: if you lose, it proves you were false; if you disagree, it proves you’re not grounded in truth. That’s how a slogan becomes a gate.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Herman
Add to List




