"This is the point being missed by readers who lament Liquor's lack of hot sex scenes, probably because they aren't old enough to understand that a passionate relationship could be about anything other than sex"
About this Quote
Brite delivers the kind of scalpel-sharp rebuke that doubles as a generational read and a defense of her own aesthetic. The line isn’t just dismissive; it’s diagnostic. She frames the complaint about Liquor as a failure of imaginative range, not taste. “Hot sex scenes” becomes shorthand for a narrow, consumer-trained expectation: that erotic charge must be literal, explicit, and on the page in a recognizable form. Her counterclaim is cooler and more cutting: if you can’t perceive passion without sex, you may not be “old enough” - emotionally, not chronologically - to recognize how intimacy actually works when desire gets braided with time, exhaustion, tenderness, duty, and the weird domestic rituals that make a life.
The subtext is protective, even territorial. Brite is guarding a version of queer (and not-only-queer) storytelling that refuses to perform sexuality on demand for an audience treating the novel like a vending machine. She’s also calling out a common reading posture: treating sex scenes as proof of “chemistry,” as if relationships are only validated when the author supplies explicit receipts.
Context matters here: Brite came up writing transgressive, sensual work, so the refusal isn’t prudish. It’s authorial control. She’s saying: if you want heat, learn to read for it in the pauses, the loyalties, the way people cook for each other, fight, forgive, and stay. The sting of the sentence is the point; it forces the reader to confront whether their disappointment is about the book’s choices or their own limits.
The subtext is protective, even territorial. Brite is guarding a version of queer (and not-only-queer) storytelling that refuses to perform sexuality on demand for an audience treating the novel like a vending machine. She’s also calling out a common reading posture: treating sex scenes as proof of “chemistry,” as if relationships are only validated when the author supplies explicit receipts.
Context matters here: Brite came up writing transgressive, sensual work, so the refusal isn’t prudish. It’s authorial control. She’s saying: if you want heat, learn to read for it in the pauses, the loyalties, the way people cook for each other, fight, forgive, and stay. The sting of the sentence is the point; it forces the reader to confront whether their disappointment is about the book’s choices or their own limits.
Quote Details
| Topic | Romantic |
|---|
More Quotes by Poppy
Add to List
