"This means that no single logic is strong enough to support the total construction of human knowledge"
About this Quote
Piaget is quietly detonating the fantasy that human knowledge can be built like a cathedral on one perfect blueprint. Coming from a psychologist who spent his career watching children assemble reality piece by piece, the line isn’t a relativist shrug; it’s a structural warning. “No single logic” isn’t an insult to logic so much as a rejection of the adult temptation to treat one favored system - formal deduction, scientific method, moral calculus, whatever’s in fashion - as a universal load-bearing beam.
The intent is developmental and political at once. Piaget’s work showed that the mind doesn’t start with pristine rationality and then add experience; it grows logics. Children move through different modes of reasoning, each coherent within its limits, each prone to collapse when pushed beyond its scope. That empirical observation becomes a broader epistemological point: human knowledge is a patchwork of tools, not a monolith. We reason mathematically, narratively, socially, ethically; we improvise with metaphors; we lean on institutions. A single “logic” can model a slice of that terrain, but not the whole map.
The subtext lands as a critique of intellectual absolutism: when a discipline claims total authority, it starts confusing its method with reality. Piaget’s phrasing also carries a humility that feels freshly relevant in an era of algorithmic confidence. The mind is not a machine running one program; it’s an evolving system that keeps rewriting its own rules, and any account of knowledge that forgets that evolution is destined to overpromise and under-explain.
The intent is developmental and political at once. Piaget’s work showed that the mind doesn’t start with pristine rationality and then add experience; it grows logics. Children move through different modes of reasoning, each coherent within its limits, each prone to collapse when pushed beyond its scope. That empirical observation becomes a broader epistemological point: human knowledge is a patchwork of tools, not a monolith. We reason mathematically, narratively, socially, ethically; we improvise with metaphors; we lean on institutions. A single “logic” can model a slice of that terrain, but not the whole map.
The subtext lands as a critique of intellectual absolutism: when a discipline claims total authority, it starts confusing its method with reality. Piaget’s phrasing also carries a humility that feels freshly relevant in an era of algorithmic confidence. The mind is not a machine running one program; it’s an evolving system that keeps rewriting its own rules, and any account of knowledge that forgets that evolution is destined to overpromise and under-explain.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by Jean
Add to List
