"This person should not be directly connected with the President Ford Committee nor should he be seen as a member of the liberal wing of the Republican Party. He should be someone like Laird or Rogers Morton"
About this Quote
A message about personnel that’s really a message about optics: keep the candidate close enough to Gerald Ford to signal competence, but far enough away to avoid inheriting the baggage of the Ford Committee or the “liberal Republican” label. Robert Teeter isn’t describing a person so much as designing a silhouette.
The line turns on two anxieties that defined mid-1970s Republican politics. First, Ford’s presidency was an accident of history, welded to Watergate’s aftermath and a party desperate to look steady rather than ideological. A direct tie to the President Ford Committee risks reading as machine politics, insider dealing, or a stale extension of a shaky incumbency. Second, “liberal wing” is treated as a contaminant. It’s shorthand for everything the rising conservative movement wanted to purge: moderation on social issues, accommodation with Democratic governance, the Eastern establishment vibe. Teeter’s instruction is a preemptive defense against being tagged before the campaign can define itself.
Then come the coded exemplars: “someone like Laird or Rogers Morton.” Melvin Laird and Rogers Morton function as trust marks - recognizable national figures, safely mainstream, managerial, hawkish enough, and crucially not cultural lightning rods. Their names imply a kind of Republican that can talk to conservatives without scaring off moderates: pragmatic, veteran, non-theatrical.
The intent is tactical: recruit a proxy who can reassure donors and party operatives while keeping the candidate’s brand clean. The subtext is harsher: in a party moving right, the worst sin isn’t incompetence; it’s looking like yesterday’s Republican.
The line turns on two anxieties that defined mid-1970s Republican politics. First, Ford’s presidency was an accident of history, welded to Watergate’s aftermath and a party desperate to look steady rather than ideological. A direct tie to the President Ford Committee risks reading as machine politics, insider dealing, or a stale extension of a shaky incumbency. Second, “liberal wing” is treated as a contaminant. It’s shorthand for everything the rising conservative movement wanted to purge: moderation on social issues, accommodation with Democratic governance, the Eastern establishment vibe. Teeter’s instruction is a preemptive defense against being tagged before the campaign can define itself.
Then come the coded exemplars: “someone like Laird or Rogers Morton.” Melvin Laird and Rogers Morton function as trust marks - recognizable national figures, safely mainstream, managerial, hawkish enough, and crucially not cultural lightning rods. Their names imply a kind of Republican that can talk to conservatives without scaring off moderates: pragmatic, veteran, non-theatrical.
The intent is tactical: recruit a proxy who can reassure donors and party operatives while keeping the candidate’s brand clean. The subtext is harsher: in a party moving right, the worst sin isn’t incompetence; it’s looking like yesterday’s Republican.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List
