"This question about Iraq has gotten personal"
About this Quote
Politics is supposed to be policy; Schroder’s line admits it’s also pride. “This question about Iraq has gotten personal” is a carefully casual confession from a leader who understood that the 2002-03 Iraq debate wasn’t just a foreign-policy file on a desk, it was a defining test of sovereignty and status inside the Western alliance.
The phrasing does two jobs at once. “This question” minimizes the moral and military enormity of war into an item on an agenda, a contained “issue” that can be argued over. Then “gotten personal” blows that containment up. Personal how? For Schroder, it signaled that U.S. pressure on Germany to support the invasion had crossed from persuasion into perceived insult: a challenge to his judgment, his electorate, and Germany’s postwar identity as a power that treats military force with suspicion. The line invites empathy without surrendering ground; it reframes a strategic dispute as a matter of dignity.
The subtext is also domestic and tactical. Schroder’s re-election campaign leaned heavily on opposing the Iraq war. By admitting it had become personal, he converts a policy stance into a character stance: I’m not posturing, I’m defending something I can’t shrug off. That’s potent because “personal” reads as authenticity in an era when diplomacy often sounds like committee-written fog.
Context matters: after 9/11, Washington expected solidarity to translate into compliance. Schroder’s remark pushes back without a grand anti-American speech. It’s the rhetorical equivalent of drawing a line on the floor: you can argue with me, but you can’t move me.
The phrasing does two jobs at once. “This question” minimizes the moral and military enormity of war into an item on an agenda, a contained “issue” that can be argued over. Then “gotten personal” blows that containment up. Personal how? For Schroder, it signaled that U.S. pressure on Germany to support the invasion had crossed from persuasion into perceived insult: a challenge to his judgment, his electorate, and Germany’s postwar identity as a power that treats military force with suspicion. The line invites empathy without surrendering ground; it reframes a strategic dispute as a matter of dignity.
The subtext is also domestic and tactical. Schroder’s re-election campaign leaned heavily on opposing the Iraq war. By admitting it had become personal, he converts a policy stance into a character stance: I’m not posturing, I’m defending something I can’t shrug off. That’s potent because “personal” reads as authenticity in an era when diplomacy often sounds like committee-written fog.
Context matters: after 9/11, Washington expected solidarity to translate into compliance. Schroder’s remark pushes back without a grand anti-American speech. It’s the rhetorical equivalent of drawing a line on the floor: you can argue with me, but you can’t move me.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Gerhard
Add to List
