"This resolution is further proof that Congress stands firmly behind our troops and remains resolved to pursue those responsible for the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, until they are discovered, detained, and punished"
About this Quote
Patriotism is doing double duty here: it’s both emotional shield and political lubricant. Doolittle’s line, delivered in the long shadow of 9/11, is less about describing a policy than about staging unanimity. “Further proof” implies there has already been doubt - and that doubt needs to be disciplined. The sentence doesn’t argue; it certifies. Congress “stands firmly” and “remains resolved,” verbs that perform steadiness for an anxious public while quietly sidestepping messy questions about strategy, scope, and endgame.
The rhetorical move is to bind two ideas so tightly they become hard to separate: supporting troops and pursuing “those responsible.” That pairing is potent because it frames skepticism about tactics as skepticism about soldiers. It’s a familiar post-crisis maneuver in American politics: moral clarity replaces legal precision. The targets are “those responsible,” but the standard of closure is expansive and indefinite: “until they are discovered, detained, and punished.” That triad reads like due process, yet it’s open-ended enough to accommodate anything from police work to global military campaigns, from intelligence dragnet to detention regimes.
Context matters: early War on Terror language frequently depended on vows that were emotionally satisfying and operationally vague. The subtext is reassurance and permission at once: reassurance that leaders are unified, permission to widen the state’s mandate. Even the cadence - discovered, detained, punished - offers the comfort of narrative completion, a promised ending to an event that felt like history had ruptured.
The rhetorical move is to bind two ideas so tightly they become hard to separate: supporting troops and pursuing “those responsible.” That pairing is potent because it frames skepticism about tactics as skepticism about soldiers. It’s a familiar post-crisis maneuver in American politics: moral clarity replaces legal precision. The targets are “those responsible,” but the standard of closure is expansive and indefinite: “until they are discovered, detained, and punished.” That triad reads like due process, yet it’s open-ended enough to accommodate anything from police work to global military campaigns, from intelligence dragnet to detention regimes.
Context matters: early War on Terror language frequently depended on vows that were emotionally satisfying and operationally vague. The subtext is reassurance and permission at once: reassurance that leaders are unified, permission to widen the state’s mandate. Even the cadence - discovered, detained, punished - offers the comfort of narrative completion, a promised ending to an event that felt like history had ruptured.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List


