"This year, we must address the Colorado Paradox. We have more college degrees per capita than any state. Yet we lag the nation in the percentage of students who go on to higher education"
About this Quote
Owens is naming a contradiction that sounds like a civic brag until you notice the trapdoor. “More college degrees per capita” is the kind of statistic politicians love to pin on the lapel: it signals prosperity, talent, and a state that “gets it.” Then he yanks it away with “Yet,” turning Colorado’s self-image into an indictment. The rhetorical move is simple and effective: he reframes an achievement as evidence of neglect.
The “Colorado Paradox” label does extra work. By branding it as a paradox, Owens makes the problem feel both urgent and solvable, like a policy puzzle rather than a moral failure. It also implies that current leadership can be judged by whether it resolves the mismatch between a highly educated adult population and weak in-state college-going rates. In other words: the state attracts or imports credentialed people, but doesn’t reliably produce them from its own schools.
Subtextually, he’s pointing at two Colorados. One is the magnet state: booming metros, in-migration, knowledge-economy jobs. The other is the homegrown pipeline: students who may be priced out, underprepared, or unconvinced college is worth it. The line “we must address” is a call to collective responsibility, but it’s also a preemptive political claim: if Colorado’s headline numbers look good, don’t let them excuse underinvestment in K-12 readiness, affordability, or access.
Context matters: in a state benefiting from educated transplants, it’s easy for leaders to confuse a strong labor market with a healthy education system. Owens’ quote refuses that conflation and makes the state’s success story sound conditional, even fragile.
The “Colorado Paradox” label does extra work. By branding it as a paradox, Owens makes the problem feel both urgent and solvable, like a policy puzzle rather than a moral failure. It also implies that current leadership can be judged by whether it resolves the mismatch between a highly educated adult population and weak in-state college-going rates. In other words: the state attracts or imports credentialed people, but doesn’t reliably produce them from its own schools.
Subtextually, he’s pointing at two Colorados. One is the magnet state: booming metros, in-migration, knowledge-economy jobs. The other is the homegrown pipeline: students who may be priced out, underprepared, or unconvinced college is worth it. The line “we must address” is a call to collective responsibility, but it’s also a preemptive political claim: if Colorado’s headline numbers look good, don’t let them excuse underinvestment in K-12 readiness, affordability, or access.
Context matters: in a state benefiting from educated transplants, it’s easy for leaders to confuse a strong labor market with a healthy education system. Owens’ quote refuses that conflation and makes the state’s success story sound conditional, even fragile.
Quote Details
| Topic | Student |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Bill
Add to List




