"Those who believe in nothing are very, very jealous and angry at those who believe in something"
About this Quote
Prager’s line is built like a provocation disguised as diagnosis: it doesn’t merely criticize “those who believe in nothing,” it frames them as emotionally compromised. The repetition of “very, very” performs a radio-ready insistence, the kind that substitutes intensity for evidence. By the time you reach “jealous and angry,” the argument has already shifted from ideas to motives. If your opponent is driven by envy, you don’t have to take their claims seriously; you just have to pity or resist them.
The subtext is a classic culture-war move: secular skepticism, relativism, or political disagreement gets flattened into “nothing,” a void where meaning should be. That’s a strategic compression. It turns a wide range of positions (atheism, liberal pluralism, cynicism, or simply doubt) into one contemptible identity, then casts believers as the aggrieved party who nonetheless possess something precious. “Believe in something” is left conveniently undefined, allowing the audience to fill it with religion, nation, tradition, family, or any moral certainty they already like.
Context matters: Prager’s brand is moral clarity delivered with talk-show cadence. The line functions less as philosophy than as rallying rhetoric. It reassures his base that hostility toward their convictions isn’t about policy or harm or history; it’s about resentment. That’s why it works: it offers believers a flattering narrative of persecution and a simple psychological story to explain complex dissent, while also daring critics to deny the charge without sounding, well, angry.
The subtext is a classic culture-war move: secular skepticism, relativism, or political disagreement gets flattened into “nothing,” a void where meaning should be. That’s a strategic compression. It turns a wide range of positions (atheism, liberal pluralism, cynicism, or simply doubt) into one contemptible identity, then casts believers as the aggrieved party who nonetheless possess something precious. “Believe in something” is left conveniently undefined, allowing the audience to fill it with religion, nation, tradition, family, or any moral certainty they already like.
Context matters: Prager’s brand is moral clarity delivered with talk-show cadence. The line functions less as philosophy than as rallying rhetoric. It reassures his base that hostility toward their convictions isn’t about policy or harm or history; it’s about resentment. That’s why it works: it offers believers a flattering narrative of persecution and a simple psychological story to explain complex dissent, while also daring critics to deny the charge without sounding, well, angry.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Dennis
Add to List








