"Those who have wrought great changes in the world never succeeded by gaining over chiefs; but always by exciting the multitude. The first is the resource of intrigue and produces only secondary results, the second is the resort of genius and transforms the universe"
About this Quote
Van Buren is basically drawing a line between two kinds of political power: the back room and the crowd. He flatters neither. “Gaining over chiefs” is framed as mere “intrigue,” a word that makes elite dealmaking sound small-bore, even a little cowardly. It can win you a policy, a post, a moment. It can’t remake the weather. The real engine of history, he argues, is mass energy - “exciting the multitude” - and he’s blunt about what that requires: not just persuasion, but ignition.
The subtext is less romantic than it first appears. “Exciting” doesn’t mean educating; it means activating emotion and identity at scale. That’s a hard-nosed admission from a president whose era saw the rise of organized parties, mass rallies, and a rapidly expanding electorate for white men. Jacksonian democracy didn’t simply broaden participation; it professionalized mobilization. Van Buren, an architect of modern party machinery, is describing the mechanism he helped refine while giving it the sheen of destiny: elite bargaining yields “secondary results,” while popular fervor is “genius.”
There’s also a warning embedded in the praise. If world-changing leaders need the multitude, then the multitude can be moved, for better or worse, by whoever can supply a story loud enough to be felt. Van Buren is legitimizing democratic power while quietly admitting its volatility: history doesn’t turn on who you know; it turns on what you can make millions believe at once.
The subtext is less romantic than it first appears. “Exciting” doesn’t mean educating; it means activating emotion and identity at scale. That’s a hard-nosed admission from a president whose era saw the rise of organized parties, mass rallies, and a rapidly expanding electorate for white men. Jacksonian democracy didn’t simply broaden participation; it professionalized mobilization. Van Buren, an architect of modern party machinery, is describing the mechanism he helped refine while giving it the sheen of destiny: elite bargaining yields “secondary results,” while popular fervor is “genius.”
There’s also a warning embedded in the praise. If world-changing leaders need the multitude, then the multitude can be moved, for better or worse, by whoever can supply a story loud enough to be felt. Van Buren is legitimizing democratic power while quietly admitting its volatility: history doesn’t turn on who you know; it turns on what you can make millions believe at once.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Martin
Add to List





