"To assert in any case that a man must be absolutely cut off from society because he is absolutely evil amounts to saying that society is absolutely good, and no-one in his right mind will believe this today"
About this Quote
Camus slips a blade under the comforting melodrama of “monsters” and twists. The line is built like a trap: if you insist someone is “absolutely evil” and therefore deserves total exclusion, you smuggle in the opposite claim without noticing it - that the rest of us, the institutions doing the excluding, are “absolutely good.” Camus doesn’t defend the criminal so much as indict the fantasy that punishment can be morally pure. His target is the binary thinking that makes violence feel hygienic: remove the stain and the fabric is clean.
The subtext is political as much as ethical. Writing in the shadow of fascism, Stalinism, war, and the bureaucratic efficiency of state killing, Camus is wary of any system that speaks in absolutes because absolutes authorize anything. Once a society crowns itself the embodiment of Good, it can banish, cage, or execute with a clear conscience - and history shows how quickly that conscience becomes a machine.
Rhetorically, the sentence weaponizes “amounts to saying”: it’s not a debate invitation, it’s a conversion of premises into consequences. He also leans on a sly modern realism in “today,” as if the 20th century has already supplied enough evidence that collective innocence is a childish story. The intent is to force moral self-implication: justice, if it’s to be human, has to admit contamination, ambiguity, and the uncomfortable fact that society’s hands are never clean when it decides who gets cast out.
The subtext is political as much as ethical. Writing in the shadow of fascism, Stalinism, war, and the bureaucratic efficiency of state killing, Camus is wary of any system that speaks in absolutes because absolutes authorize anything. Once a society crowns itself the embodiment of Good, it can banish, cage, or execute with a clear conscience - and history shows how quickly that conscience becomes a machine.
Rhetorically, the sentence weaponizes “amounts to saying”: it’s not a debate invitation, it’s a conversion of premises into consequences. He also leans on a sly modern realism in “today,” as if the 20th century has already supplied enough evidence that collective innocence is a childish story. The intent is to force moral self-implication: justice, if it’s to be human, has to admit contamination, ambiguity, and the uncomfortable fact that society’s hands are never clean when it decides who gets cast out.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Albert
Add to List









