"To be content with little is hard; to be content with much, impossible"
About this Quote
Contentment, Ebner-Eschenbach suggests, is less a possession than a practiced defiance of desire. The line turns common moral advice inside out: we’re told to be grateful for what we have, yet she insists the real difficulty starts at the bottom. “Content with little” is hard because scarcity isn’t romantic; it is daily arithmetic, a constant negotiation with need, shame, and comparison. The sentence doesn’t flatter poverty with nobility. It admits the strain.
Then she sharpens the blade: “content with much, impossible.” Not because abundance is evil, but because it breeds appetite. “Much” expands the perimeter of the self. It introduces new anxieties (maintenance, status, loss) and new mirrors (people with even more). The more you can have, the less settled any “enough” feels. Subtext: prosperity doesn’t buy peace; it purchases a larger arena for restlessness.
The rhetoric works because it’s balanced and brutal. Two clauses, two verdicts, escalating from “hard” to “impossible.” That escalation has the snap of lived observation, not sermon. As a late-19th-century novelist in the Austro-Hungarian world, Ebner-Eschenbach wrote amid sharp class stratification and a bourgeois culture increasingly organized around acquisition and display. Her aphorism reads like a quiet indictment of modern consumer psychology before the term existed: the engine of “more” is designed to outrun satisfaction. If there’s a moral here, it’s unsentimental - contentment isn’t a natural endpoint of success. It’s a discipline that success actively sabotages.
Then she sharpens the blade: “content with much, impossible.” Not because abundance is evil, but because it breeds appetite. “Much” expands the perimeter of the self. It introduces new anxieties (maintenance, status, loss) and new mirrors (people with even more). The more you can have, the less settled any “enough” feels. Subtext: prosperity doesn’t buy peace; it purchases a larger arena for restlessness.
The rhetoric works because it’s balanced and brutal. Two clauses, two verdicts, escalating from “hard” to “impossible.” That escalation has the snap of lived observation, not sermon. As a late-19th-century novelist in the Austro-Hungarian world, Ebner-Eschenbach wrote amid sharp class stratification and a bourgeois culture increasingly organized around acquisition and display. Her aphorism reads like a quiet indictment of modern consumer psychology before the term existed: the engine of “more” is designed to outrun satisfaction. If there’s a moral here, it’s unsentimental - contentment isn’t a natural endpoint of success. It’s a discipline that success actively sabotages.
Quote Details
| Topic | Contentment |
|---|---|
| Source | Wikiquote: Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach — lists the English quotation “To be content with little is hard; to be content with much, impossible” (attribution compiled on author page; primary source not specified). |
More Quotes by Marie
Add to List








