"To be deeply committed to negotiations, to be opposed to a particular war or military action, is not only considered unpatriotic, it also casts serious doubt on one's manhood"
About this Quote
Patriotism and masculinity get braided together so tightly in Miedzian's line that dissent becomes a kind of gender violation. The move is blunt on purpose: she isn't arguing policy, she's diagnosing a cultural reflex. In a lot of American war rhetoric, the battlefield is only half the theater; the other half is social approval. Support the strike, sound tough, prove you belong. Push for negotiations, question the premise, ask for restraint, and you risk being recast as soft, suspect, even less of a man.
The phrasing matters. "Deeply committed to negotiations" is not passivity; it's work, patience, and stamina. By framing diplomacy as a commitment, she flips the usual hierarchy that treats talk as evasion and violence as resolve. The sting comes from "not only" to "it also": the charge escalates from civic betrayal ("unpatriotic") to personal emasculation ("serious doubt on one's manhood"). That's the subtextual engine. Once manhood is on the line, arguments don't have to be won; they just have to be dominated.
As an actress, Miedzian is also attuned to roles, scripts, and casting. Her point is that public debate around war often runs like a performance, where the "real men" deliver hawkish lines and everyone else gets heckled offstage. The intent is to expose the coercion hiding inside those cues: militarism sustains itself not just through fear of enemies, but through fear of social ridicule. Negotiation becomes brave only when we stop treating it like a threat to identity.
The phrasing matters. "Deeply committed to negotiations" is not passivity; it's work, patience, and stamina. By framing diplomacy as a commitment, she flips the usual hierarchy that treats talk as evasion and violence as resolve. The sting comes from "not only" to "it also": the charge escalates from civic betrayal ("unpatriotic") to personal emasculation ("serious doubt on one's manhood"). That's the subtextual engine. Once manhood is on the line, arguments don't have to be won; they just have to be dominated.
As an actress, Miedzian is also attuned to roles, scripts, and casting. Her point is that public debate around war often runs like a performance, where the "real men" deliver hawkish lines and everyone else gets heckled offstage. The intent is to expose the coercion hiding inside those cues: militarism sustains itself not just through fear of enemies, but through fear of social ridicule. Negotiation becomes brave only when we stop treating it like a threat to identity.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Myriam
Add to List
