"To-day it appears as though it may well be altogether abolished in the future as it has to some extent been mitigated in the past by the unceasing, and as it now appears, unlimited ascent of man to knowledge, and through knowledge to physical power and dominion over Nature"
About this Quote
Soddy is doing something sly here: he dresses a radical social hope in the sober suit of scientific inevitability. The sentence barrels forward on its own momentum, a long Victorian exhale that turns “appears as though” into a wager and “may well” into a quiet insistence. Whatever “it” is - war, want, ignorance, even the old Malthusian logic of scarcity - he frames it as a technical problem already half-solved, steadily “mitigated” by the one force he trusts: the compounding ascent of knowledge.
The intent is missionary, but not religious. Soddy is selling progress as the new providence, where human betterment is not a moral conversion but an engineering outcome. The subtext is more complicated: the same phrase that sounds liberating (“physical power and dominion over Nature”) also reveals the era’s blind spot. Dominion is not stewardship. It’s control, extraction, the confidence that Nature is a system to be mastered rather than a partner with limits. Coming from a scientist who lived through the industrial acceleration of the early 20th century - and the dawn of nuclear possibility - that confidence reads as both visionary and unnerving.
Context matters: Soddy wrote in a world where science had begun to outperform politics at shaping everyday life, yet the “physical power” he praises was also being weaponized at unprecedented scale. The line functions as a progress narrative with a hairline crack in it: it assumes knowledge naturally trends toward emancipation, when history keeps proving it also perfects domination - of nature, and of each other.
The intent is missionary, but not religious. Soddy is selling progress as the new providence, where human betterment is not a moral conversion but an engineering outcome. The subtext is more complicated: the same phrase that sounds liberating (“physical power and dominion over Nature”) also reveals the era’s blind spot. Dominion is not stewardship. It’s control, extraction, the confidence that Nature is a system to be mastered rather than a partner with limits. Coming from a scientist who lived through the industrial acceleration of the early 20th century - and the dawn of nuclear possibility - that confidence reads as both visionary and unnerving.
Context matters: Soddy wrote in a world where science had begun to outperform politics at shaping everyday life, yet the “physical power” he praises was also being weaponized at unprecedented scale. The line functions as a progress narrative with a hairline crack in it: it assumes knowledge naturally trends toward emancipation, when history keeps proving it also perfects domination - of nature, and of each other.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by Frederick
Add to List




