"To destroy a standing crop goes against the soundest instincts of human nature"
About this Quote
The line carries the early 20th-century American tension between farm-as-vocation and farm-as-industry. As a politician tied to agricultural governance, Wallace was speaking into a world where overproduction could crush prices, where “rational” remedies sometimes meant reducing supply. His phrasing preempts that logic. It implies that technocratic fixes have crossed into something perverse: a system so misaligned it asks people to vandalize their own work.
Subtextually, he’s defending farmers against a market that demands self-sabotage while shielding consumers and financiers from comparable sacrifice. It also signals a fear of social rupture. When a government tolerates destroying food in the presence of need, legitimacy frays. Wallace’s instinct talk is a warning: ignore that visceral line, and you don’t just break crops - you break faith.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Wallace, Henry Cantwell. (2026, January 16). To destroy a standing crop goes against the soundest instincts of human nature. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/to-destroy-a-standing-crop-goes-against-the-118902/
Chicago Style
Wallace, Henry Cantwell. "To destroy a standing crop goes against the soundest instincts of human nature." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/to-destroy-a-standing-crop-goes-against-the-118902/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"To destroy a standing crop goes against the soundest instincts of human nature." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/to-destroy-a-standing-crop-goes-against-the-118902/. Accessed 18 Feb. 2026.







