"To love one person with a private love is poor and miserable: to love all is glorious"
About this Quote
The trick is how he weaponizes comparison. “One person” versus “all” is not a quantitative upgrade; it’s a conversion narrative. Loving “all” isn’t activism or mere friendliness; it’s a theological claim about reality. For Traherne, creation is saturated with divine goodness, so selective love becomes a failure of perception. The subtext is epistemic: if you truly see the world as gift, your love can’t stay locked in the private room of preference.
“Glorious” does heavy lifting. It invokes not just moral approval but radiance, a public, almost bodily splendor. Traherne isn’t asking you to love less intimately; he’s insisting that intimacy without universality curdles into anxiety, jealousy, and fear of loss. The line sells a paradox with confidence: the way to make love bigger isn’t to dilute it, but to stop treating it as a scarce resource.
Quote Details
| Topic | Love |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Traherne, Thomas. (2026, January 18). To love one person with a private love is poor and miserable: to love all is glorious. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/to-love-one-person-with-a-private-love-is-poor-5703/
Chicago Style
Traherne, Thomas. "To love one person with a private love is poor and miserable: to love all is glorious." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/to-love-one-person-with-a-private-love-is-poor-5703/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"To love one person with a private love is poor and miserable: to love all is glorious." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/to-love-one-person-with-a-private-love-is-poor-5703/. Accessed 21 Feb. 2026.











