"To love one person with a private love is poor and miserable: to love all is glorious"
About this Quote
Traherne’s line swings a moral hammer with the gentlest possible handle: what looks like romantic devotion gets reframed as spiritual smallness. “Private love” isn’t just intimate; it’s proprietary. The phrase carries a faint stink of hoarding, as if affection can be cordoned off like land. Calling that love “poor and miserable” is deliberately abrasive, a Puritan-adjacent rebuke aimed at the seventeenth-century tendency to treat the household as the main stage of virtue. Traherne, an Anglican mystic writing in the aftermath of civil war and religious fracture, is arguing for a scale shift: the soul’s health is measured by its capacity for expansiveness.
The trick is how he weaponizes comparison. “One person” versus “all” is not a quantitative upgrade; it’s a conversion narrative. Loving “all” isn’t activism or mere friendliness; it’s a theological claim about reality. For Traherne, creation is saturated with divine goodness, so selective love becomes a failure of perception. The subtext is epistemic: if you truly see the world as gift, your love can’t stay locked in the private room of preference.
“Glorious” does heavy lifting. It invokes not just moral approval but radiance, a public, almost bodily splendor. Traherne isn’t asking you to love less intimately; he’s insisting that intimacy without universality curdles into anxiety, jealousy, and fear of loss. The line sells a paradox with confidence: the way to make love bigger isn’t to dilute it, but to stop treating it as a scarce resource.
The trick is how he weaponizes comparison. “One person” versus “all” is not a quantitative upgrade; it’s a conversion narrative. Loving “all” isn’t activism or mere friendliness; it’s a theological claim about reality. For Traherne, creation is saturated with divine goodness, so selective love becomes a failure of perception. The subtext is epistemic: if you truly see the world as gift, your love can’t stay locked in the private room of preference.
“Glorious” does heavy lifting. It invokes not just moral approval but radiance, a public, almost bodily splendor. Traherne isn’t asking you to love less intimately; he’s insisting that intimacy without universality curdles into anxiety, jealousy, and fear of loss. The line sells a paradox with confidence: the way to make love bigger isn’t to dilute it, but to stop treating it as a scarce resource.
Quote Details
| Topic | Love |
|---|
More Quotes by Thomas
Add to List










