"To philosophize is only another way of being afraid and leads hardly anywhere but to cowardly make-believe"
About this Quote
Celine’s line doesn’t just sneer at philosophy; it tries to strip it of its dignity. “To philosophize” is framed as a behavioral tic, not an intellectual act: a way of converting raw fear into respectable language. The insult lands in the adverb “only,” a verbal knife that reduces centuries of inquiry to a nervous habit. He’s not arguing with Plato so much as diagnosing the philosopher as a type: someone who, when faced with pain, death, war, or humiliation, retreats into systems that feel brave because they’re abstract.
The subtext is pure Celine: disgust with bourgeois consolation, with talk that substitutes for risk. “Cowardly make-believe” is doing double duty. It mocks the comfort of metaphysical narratives and accuses their authors of fraudulence, as if ideas are costumes fear wears to pass in public. The phrase “leads hardly anywhere” is a jab at philosophy’s promise of progress; it implies that the destination is always a cul-de-sac of self-justification.
Context matters because Celine wrote out of a century that made intellectual optimism look obscene: mechanized slaughter, ideological fanaticism, and a Europe where lofty theories routinely arrived in uniform. His own biography and notoriety complicate the posture here; the anti-philosophy stance can read less like bravery than preemptive cynicism, a way to discredit moral scrutiny before it reaches him. That’s why the sentence works: it’s a provocation masquerading as tough-minded honesty, daring the reader to prove they’re not afraid by refusing the very tools that might judge fear, cruelty, or complicity.
The subtext is pure Celine: disgust with bourgeois consolation, with talk that substitutes for risk. “Cowardly make-believe” is doing double duty. It mocks the comfort of metaphysical narratives and accuses their authors of fraudulence, as if ideas are costumes fear wears to pass in public. The phrase “leads hardly anywhere” is a jab at philosophy’s promise of progress; it implies that the destination is always a cul-de-sac of self-justification.
Context matters because Celine wrote out of a century that made intellectual optimism look obscene: mechanized slaughter, ideological fanaticism, and a Europe where lofty theories routinely arrived in uniform. His own biography and notoriety complicate the posture here; the anti-philosophy stance can read less like bravery than preemptive cynicism, a way to discredit moral scrutiny before it reaches him. That’s why the sentence works: it’s a provocation masquerading as tough-minded honesty, daring the reader to prove they’re not afraid by refusing the very tools that might judge fear, cruelty, or complicity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Louis-Ferdinand
Add to List
