"To swallow and follow, whether old doctrine or new propaganda, is a weakness still dominating the human mind"
About this Quote
Gilman’s jab lands because it doesn’t flatter the reader with the comforting fantasy that gullibility belongs to “other people.” “To swallow and follow” is physical language: belief as ingestion, obedience as digestion. It’s a deliberately unromantic picture of how ideas enter us when we’re tired, afraid, or socially rewarded for not chewing. The paired targets - “old doctrine” and “new propaganda” - widen the indictment. She’s not performing the easy modern trick of sneering at tradition while posing as enlightened; she’s warning that novelty can be just as coercive as scripture when it’s packaged as progress.
The intent is corrective, almost hygienic: stop treating inherited norms or mass messaging as neutral background noise. Gilman wrote in an America churning with industrial capitalism, suffrage politics, “scientific” social theories, and a booming press - a perfect ecosystem for both sanctified dogma and slick persuasion. As a feminist and social critic, she had a stake in showing how institutions train people to mistake conformity for virtue, especially women, whose “role” was frequently defended as timeless truth and then rebranded as modern common sense.
The subtext is bluntly democratic and faintly impatient: if the human mind remains dominated by this weakness, reform will always be reversible. Any movement can become its own catechism; any liberation can calcify into slogans. Gilman’s line asks for a harder kind of self-respect: skepticism not as cynicism, but as the discipline of thinking in public without becoming a mouthpiece.
The intent is corrective, almost hygienic: stop treating inherited norms or mass messaging as neutral background noise. Gilman wrote in an America churning with industrial capitalism, suffrage politics, “scientific” social theories, and a booming press - a perfect ecosystem for both sanctified dogma and slick persuasion. As a feminist and social critic, she had a stake in showing how institutions train people to mistake conformity for virtue, especially women, whose “role” was frequently defended as timeless truth and then rebranded as modern common sense.
The subtext is bluntly democratic and faintly impatient: if the human mind remains dominated by this weakness, reform will always be reversible. Any movement can become its own catechism; any liberation can calcify into slogans. Gilman’s line asks for a harder kind of self-respect: skepticism not as cynicism, but as the discipline of thinking in public without becoming a mouthpiece.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Charlotte
Add to List







