"To think straight, it is advisable to expect all qualities and attributes, adjectives, and so on to refer to at least two sets of interactions in time"
About this Quote
Thinking straight, Bateson suggests, requires a double-vision most of us resist: every description is also a prediction about change. An “adjective” feels like a solid tag you can pin to a person or thing - smart, broken, stable, aggressive. Bateson punctures that comfort. In his systems-minded worldview, a “quality” never lives inside an object the way a coin sits in a pocket; it shows up in relationships, and relationships only reveal themselves across time.
That’s the point of his slightly fussy phrasing (“qualities and attributes, adjectives, and so on”): he’s calling out the everyday grammar that tricks us into thinking we’re reporting facts when we’re actually freezing a moving process. “At least two sets of interactions in time” is Bateson’s demand for a before-and-after, or a pattern across contexts. If you call a child “defiant,” are you describing the child, the parent-child loop, the classroom power structure, yesterday’s fight, tomorrow’s expectation? The label smuggles in causality and blame, even when it pretends to be neutral.
The subtext is quietly ethical. Single-frame descriptions invite simplistic interventions: fix the person, punish the behavior, medicate the symptom. Bateson, writing in the orbit of cybernetics, ecology, and family-systems therapy, is warning that linear thinking makes you clumsy in complex environments. The quote works because it turns an abstract epistemological claim into a practical editing rule for the mind: if your description doesn’t survive contact with time, it’s not “straight” thinking - it’s a snapshot masquerading as a map.
That’s the point of his slightly fussy phrasing (“qualities and attributes, adjectives, and so on”): he’s calling out the everyday grammar that tricks us into thinking we’re reporting facts when we’re actually freezing a moving process. “At least two sets of interactions in time” is Bateson’s demand for a before-and-after, or a pattern across contexts. If you call a child “defiant,” are you describing the child, the parent-child loop, the classroom power structure, yesterday’s fight, tomorrow’s expectation? The label smuggles in causality and blame, even when it pretends to be neutral.
The subtext is quietly ethical. Single-frame descriptions invite simplistic interventions: fix the person, punish the behavior, medicate the symptom. Bateson, writing in the orbit of cybernetics, ecology, and family-systems therapy, is warning that linear thinking makes you clumsy in complex environments. The quote works because it turns an abstract epistemological claim into a practical editing rule for the mind: if your description doesn’t survive contact with time, it’s not “straight” thinking - it’s a snapshot masquerading as a map.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Gregory
Add to List







