"Today, many companies are reporting that their number one constraint on growth is the inability to hire workers with the necessary skills"
About this Quote
A president rarely talks about labor shortages without also talking about power. Clinton’s line sounds like a neutral briefing from the boardroom, but it’s a political repositioning: growth isn’t being capped by taxes, regulation, or global competition, he implies; it’s being capped by people - or rather, by the mismatch between what the economy demands and what the workforce can supply.
The specific intent is to make “skills” the acceptable language for a difficult economic transition. In the 1990s and after, the U.S. was moving deeper into an information-and-service economy while manufacturing employment thinned out. Saying companies “can’t hire workers with the necessary skills” reframes that upheaval as a solvable, technocratic problem: train the worker, modernize the pipeline, keep the engine running. It nudges listeners away from class conflict and toward workforce development as common sense.
The subtext, though, cuts both ways. It subtly shifts responsibility onto workers and schools, not employers. If firms can’t find talent, the assumption is that wages and working conditions are already sufficient - that the market is fine and the people are the bottleneck. That’s rhetorically convenient in a centrist, pro-growth politics: it asks for investment in education and training without demanding a fight over labor standards.
Context matters: Clinton’s political brand was triangulation - embracing markets while promising opportunity. This sentence carries that DNA. It’s a call to treat human capital as infrastructure, and a warning that the real economic divide will be cognitive and credentialed, not just geographic or industrial.
The specific intent is to make “skills” the acceptable language for a difficult economic transition. In the 1990s and after, the U.S. was moving deeper into an information-and-service economy while manufacturing employment thinned out. Saying companies “can’t hire workers with the necessary skills” reframes that upheaval as a solvable, technocratic problem: train the worker, modernize the pipeline, keep the engine running. It nudges listeners away from class conflict and toward workforce development as common sense.
The subtext, though, cuts both ways. It subtly shifts responsibility onto workers and schools, not employers. If firms can’t find talent, the assumption is that wages and working conditions are already sufficient - that the market is fine and the people are the bottleneck. That’s rhetorically convenient in a centrist, pro-growth politics: it asks for investment in education and training without demanding a fight over labor standards.
Context matters: Clinton’s political brand was triangulation - embracing markets while promising opportunity. This sentence carries that DNA. It’s a call to treat human capital as infrastructure, and a warning that the real economic divide will be cognitive and credentialed, not just geographic or industrial.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by William
Add to List


