"Too much may be the equivalent of none at all"
About this Quote
A lawyer’s warning, delivered with the cool efficiency of a closing argument: excess can cancel itself out. “Too much may be the equivalent of none at all” isn’t anti-abundance so much as a diagnosis of how systems fail when they overcompensate. Loevinger, writing from the legal world, is attuned to thresholds: evidence becomes noise, safeguards become paralysis, rights become performative, regulation becomes a maze that favors whoever can pay to navigate it.
The line works because it flips a commonsense assumption. We tend to treat “more” as a moral and practical upgrade-more information, more options, more rules, more outrage, more content. Loevinger suggests a darker symmetry: overload doesn’t merely diminish returns; it can nullify them. The word “equivalent” is doing legal work here. It’s not poetic “too much is bad,” but a near-technical claim about functional outcomes. If an argument is stuffed with citations, the jury stops listening. If a contract tries to anticipate every contingency, it becomes unreadable and therefore unenforceable in practice. If a public agency issues guidance for every edge case, compliance becomes guesswork.
Subtext: restraint isn’t minimalism; it’s strategy. Knowing what to leave out is a form of power, especially in institutions that pretend to be purely rational. The quote also carries a quiet rebuke to bureaucratic and rhetorical inflation-the instinct to prove seriousness by piling on. In that sense, it feels strikingly contemporary: in an attention economy, “too much” isn’t richness; it’s a way of disappearing.
The line works because it flips a commonsense assumption. We tend to treat “more” as a moral and practical upgrade-more information, more options, more rules, more outrage, more content. Loevinger suggests a darker symmetry: overload doesn’t merely diminish returns; it can nullify them. The word “equivalent” is doing legal work here. It’s not poetic “too much is bad,” but a near-technical claim about functional outcomes. If an argument is stuffed with citations, the jury stops listening. If a contract tries to anticipate every contingency, it becomes unreadable and therefore unenforceable in practice. If a public agency issues guidance for every edge case, compliance becomes guesswork.
Subtext: restraint isn’t minimalism; it’s strategy. Knowing what to leave out is a form of power, especially in institutions that pretend to be purely rational. The quote also carries a quiet rebuke to bureaucratic and rhetorical inflation-the instinct to prove seriousness by piling on. In that sense, it feels strikingly contemporary: in an attention economy, “too much” isn’t richness; it’s a way of disappearing.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Lee
Add to List
