"Too often we think we can act without explaining and take decisions without justifying them"
About this Quote
The phrasing matters. “Too often” signals a pattern, not a one-off scandal. “Think we can” targets mindset before policy: the internal story decision-makers tell themselves to make unilateral action feel normal. “Act” and “take decisions” split performance from authority: the public sees gestures and announcements, but rarely the reasoning that would allow citizens to consent, object, or course-correct. Mandelson’s subtext is that opacity is not just morally dubious; it’s strategically stupid. When you don’t explain, your opponents will. When you don’t justify, your motives get written for you - by tabloids, by rivals, by algorithmic outrage.
Contextually, this sits inside late-20th/early-21st century governance: New Labour’s obsession with message discipline, the rise of “sofa government,” and a broader drift toward executive centralization. It reads as both confession and warning: modern politics can win elections on control, but it can’t sustain trust without narrative accountability.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Mandelson, Peter. (2026, January 15). Too often we think we can act without explaining and take decisions without justifying them. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/too-often-we-think-we-can-act-without-explaining-160739/
Chicago Style
Mandelson, Peter. "Too often we think we can act without explaining and take decisions without justifying them." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/too-often-we-think-we-can-act-without-explaining-160739/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Too often we think we can act without explaining and take decisions without justifying them." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/too-often-we-think-we-can-act-without-explaining-160739/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.







