"Torture is illegal, both in the U.S. and abroad. So - and that is true for the Bush administration and for any other administration"

Jane Mayer's quote, "Torture is unlawful, both in the U.S. and abroad. So - and that is true for the Bush administration and for any other administration", highlights numerous key points about the legal and ethical dimensions of abuse and its restriction under global and domestic law. This declaration serves as a tip that the illegality of torture is exempt to change depending upon political management or context; rather, it is a constant legal principle that applies universally.

To start with, the quote underscores the unquestionable nature of laws against abuse. In the United States, torture is explicitly restricted by both domestic laws-- such as the U.S. Constitution, which can be translated to forbid harsh and uncommon penalty-- and global contracts like the United Nations Convention Against Torture, to which the U.S. is a signatory. This suggests that irrespective of who is in power, the act of abuse remains outside the bounds of legality and morality.

Additionally, the reference to the Bush administration mentions the controversial practices utilized throughout the War on Terror. Mayer mentions that in spite of the validations utilized at the time, such as boosted interrogation strategies, the legal prohibition of torture remained unchanged. This acts as a review of any administration that may attempt to prevent or reinterpret these prohibitions for policy objectives, advising us of the stress that can exist between security procedures and human rights securities.

Notably, the declaration shows the more comprehensive worldwide consensus against torture. It is a practice condemned worldwide, codified in different human rights treaties and nationwide laws. Mayer's assertion suggests that the worldwide community holds a shared obligation to uphold these concepts, enhancing the idea that human rights are universal and inalienable.

In conclusion, Jane Mayer's quote repeats the basic legal and ethical position that abuse is impermissible, reminding all administrations, despite political position or external situations, to stick to this concept. By emphasizing the guideline of law and human rights, her statement requires accountability and caution in making sure that such practices are never employed, therefore protecting human dignity.